TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM, INSTITUTIONS OF TECHNOLOGY HIGHER EDUCATION: QUALITY GUIDELINES

被引:0
|
作者
Parada Romero, Laura Belkis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Militar Nueva Granada, Educ, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
teacher evaluation; technology assessment; educational quality guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Due to the globalization of education, it has become prevalent to strengthen the quality systems to ensure that educational actors in higher education institutions are the best. In this context teachers are given a main role since they are cornerstones in educational processes. Currently, teacher quality is assessed through an assessment or evaluation system. Almost every university evaluates its teachers, but there is no legal regulation on how to do it; in most institutions there is a professional in charge of designing and applying assessment instruments according to the authors he/she prefers. In most universities, on the one hand, it is used a traditional questionnaire aiming to collect data about dimensions associated with teaching; on the other hand, there is another option in which assessment models include self-evaluation, as in some cases in Chile. That's why one of the concerns of this research is to propose guidelines for a more qualitative and formative assessment not exclusively following political parameters - based on administrative decisions-, but following emerging proposals with a deeper analysis. Nowadays the main actors in teacher evaluation are teachers, students and administrative staff; every six months these actors are evaluated by using an assessment tool that they usually do not know. The research investigates the perception actors in teacher evaluation have regarding its objectives, methods and stages, so they put forward ideas on how to restructure the current institutional assessment and propose improvements aiming at both the quantitative aspect and the qualitative analysis of performances and skills.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 198
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE PRACTICE OF QUALITY IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
    Deselnicu, D. C.
    Rusu, C.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 415 - 420
  • [42] Supporting quality research in institutions of higher education
    Harman, G
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1998, 42 (03) : 285 - 302
  • [43] The Implementation of Quality Assessment in Higher Education Institutions
    Jin Li
    Li Kai
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON EDUCATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, 2008, : 560 - 564
  • [44] Design of teaching quality evaluation system for higher vocational education based on data mining technology
    Li Y.
    Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [45] An exploration of the quality of graduates of Philippine teacher education institutions
    Olvido, Michelle Mae J.
    Dayagbil, Filomena T.
    Alda, Rivika C.
    Uytico, Baby Jane
    Rodriguez, Kim Francis R.
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9
  • [46] National Survey of Teacher Loads in Departments of Physical Education in Institutions of Higher Education
    Krakower, Hyman
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1945, 16 (04): : 288 - 292
  • [47] The Main Benefits of the Implementation of the Quality Management System in Higher Education Institutions in Angola
    Africano, Nicolay
    Rodrigues, Ana S.
    Santos, Gilberto
    QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY-KVALITA INOVACIA PROSPERITA, 2019, 23 (03): : 122 - 136
  • [48] Community engagement by Higher Education Institutions - a practical model and guidelines
    Coetzee, E.
    AFRICA EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 9 (03) : 501 - 517
  • [49] Evaluating teacher quality in higher education.
    Partington, P
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 35 (01) : 115 - 117
  • [50] Sustainable evaluation systems in higher education institutions
    Mendoza-Cavazos, Yolanda
    CIENCIAUAT, 2016, 11 (01) : 65 - 78