EARLY CHANGES IN BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ABOVE A COMBINED ANTEROPOSTERIOR L4-S1 LUMBAR SPINAL-FUSION - A CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

被引:36
作者
BOGDANFFY, GM
OHNMEISS, DD
GUYER, RD
机构
[1] Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX
关键词
Bone mineral density; Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry repeatability; Spinal fusion;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199508000-00005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Fifteen patients meeting rigid study entrance criteria for undergoing a combined anteroposterior L4-S1 spinal fusion as a first time operation were included in the study. Bone mineral density changes at adjacent segments (L3 and L2) were assessed by scanning patients in the anteroposterior and lateral projections before surgery and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Objectives. To prospectively evaluate changes in bone mineral density at adjacent segments after lumbar spinal fusion and postoperative bracing. Summary of Background Data. The majority of studies investigating changes in bone mineral density after spinal fusion have been performed in canines. Although such work has provided valuable insight, its application to humans is questionable because the loading mechanics are so different. Methods. Bone mineral density was assessed noninvasively by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the lateral and anteroposterior projections. Data were analyzed with special edge detection software. Results. In the lateral projection at L3, one level above the fusion, the preoperative bone mineral density was 0.91 +/- 0.24 (mean +/- standard deviation in g/cm(2)). This decreased significantly at 3 months to 0.82 +/- 0.24 and remained reduced at 6 months (0.80 +/- 0.21). This reflected a loss of primarily trabecular bone. In the anteroposterior projection at L2, there was a significant loss at 3- and 6-month follow-up (1.24 +/- 0.15 to 1.19 +/- 0.15 and 1.19 +/- 0.14). This may reflect changes at either or both of the anterior and posterior columns. Conclusion. Significant decreases in bone mineral density were noted above fused lumbar segments. This may have been related to immobilization or altered mechanics associated with arthrodesis. Trabecular bone of the axial skeleton is most responsive to change, compared with cortical bone, because of the higher metabolic activity. This may explain the reduction of bone mineral density at L3. Changes at L2 may have been related to altered loads at the anterior or posterior columns and should be further investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1678
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Blumenthal S.L., Selby D.K., Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and its relationship to the rate of posterior spinal fusion, Orthopaedic Transactions, 12, (1988)
  • [2] Bogdanffy G.M., Ohnmeiss D.D., Relationship and Reliability of Ultrasound and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) for the Assessment of Bone, (1994)
  • [3] Coe J.D., Warden K.E., Herzig M.A., McAfee P.C., Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants: A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires, Spine, 15, pp. 902-907, (1990)
  • [4] Craven T.G., Carson W.L., Asher M.A., Robinson R.G., The effect of implant stiffness on the bypassed bone mineral density and facet fusion stiffness of the canine spine, Spine, 19, pp. 1664-1673, (1994)
  • [5] Dalenberg D.D., Asher M.A., Robinson R.G., Jayaraman G., The effect of a stiff spinal implant and its loosening on bone mineral content in canines, Spine, 18, pp. 1862-1866, (1993)
  • [6] Engh C.A., Bobyn J.D., The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop, 231, pp. 7-28, (1988)
  • [7] Farey I.D., McAfee P.C., Gurr K.R., Randolph M.A., Quantitative histologic study of the influence of spinal instrumentation on lumbar fusions: A canine model, J Orthop Res, 7, pp. 709-722, (1989)
  • [8] Fedder I.L., McAfee P.C., Biomechanical consideration of spinal surgery, Semin Spine Surg, 4, pp. 136-141, (1992)
  • [9] Goel V.K., Lim T.-H., Gwon J., Et al., Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device: A comprehensive biomechanical investigation, Spine, 16, (1991)
  • [10] Ha K.Y., Schendel M.J., Lewis J.L., Ogilvie J.W., Effect of immobilization configuration on lumbar adjacent-segment biomechanics, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 6, pp. 99-105, (1993)