The Strange Revival of Bicameralism

被引:13
作者
Coakley, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Polit Int Studies & Philosophy, Polit, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
legislatures; parliament; bicameralism; second chamber; political reform;
D O I
10.1080/13572334.2014.926168
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 28 countries all but one of them unitary - adopting the bicameral system. This article explores this development by first setting it in the context of the historical evolution of second chambers and the arguments that support bicameralism, and then exploring the characteristics that distinguish today's second chambers from first chambers. A 'census' of second chambers in 2014 is used to provide data on second chambers in federal and unitary states, to facilitate comparison with earlier data, and to distinguish between 'new' and longer-established second chambers. The article concludes that newly established second chambers are concentrated predominantly in political systems where liberal democratic principles are not established, suggesting that the debate over their role in democratic states is set to continue.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 572
页数:31
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Ameller M, 1966, PARLIAMENTS COMP STU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, CONCEPT REPRESENTATI
[3]  
Arter D, 2000, J LEGISLATIVE STUDIE, V6, P45
[4]  
Bagehot Walter, 1872, FORTNIGHTLY REV, P1
[5]  
Baldwin N. D. J., 2001, J LEGISLATIVE STUDIE, V7, P171
[6]  
Blondel J., 1973, COMP LEGISLATURES
[7]   'A More Representative Chamber': Representation and the House of Lords [J].
Bochel, Hugh ;
Defty, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES, 2012, 18 (01) :82-97
[8]  
BORTHWICK R. L., 2001, J LEGISLATIVE STUDIE, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/714003858
[9]  
Brosio G, 2006, CTR STUDIES FEDERALI, V4, P33
[10]  
Bryce James, 1921, MODERN DEMOCRACIES, VII