Cost-Benefit Analysis of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on Patients With Diabetes

被引:7
作者
Deng, Lan [1 ]
White, Adam S. [2 ,3 ]
Pawlowska, Monika [3 ]
Pottinger, Betty [4 ]
Aydin, Jessica [4 ]
Chow, Nelson [5 ]
Tildesley, Hugh D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Biochem, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Endocrine Res Soc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Biochem, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Diabetes Mellitus; Internet; Economics; Online Systems; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Telemedicine; Cost-Benefit Analysis;
D O I
10.5812/ijem.22803
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With the emergence of IBGMS for allowing for patients to communicate their self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) readings with their health care providers, their impact on the management of diabetes is becoming well-supported with regards to clinical benefits. Their impact on healthcare costs, however, has yet to be investigated. This study aims to determine the cost-benefits of such interventions in comparison to routine care. Objectives: To analyze the cost-benefit of an Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Service (IBGMS) in comparison to routine diabetes care. Patients and Methods: 200 patients were surveyed to assess the cost associated with doctor appointments in the past 12 months. Annual number of visits to medical services for diabetes and costs of transportation, parking, and time taken off work for visits were surveyed. Self-reported frequency of SMBG and most recent A1C were also surveyed. We compared 100 patients who used the IBGMS with 100 patients who only used routine care. Results: There is a trend of lowered total cost in the intervention group compared to the control group. The control group spent $210.89 per year on visits to physicians; the intervention group spent $131.26 (P = 0.128). Patients in control group visited their endocrinologist 1.76 times per year, those in intervention group visited their endocrinologist 1.36 times per year, significantly less frequently than the control group (P = 0.014). Number of visits to other medical services is similar between the groups. Average A1C in intervention group is 7.57%, in control group is 7.69% (P = 0.309). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that IBGMS, while not reaching statistical significance, may be associated with slightly reduced A1C and cost due to visiting physicians.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is cost-benefit analysis anomaly-proof?
    Hanley, N
    Shogren, JF
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 (01) : 13 - 34
  • [42] Technological Literacy for Democracy: a Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Carabantes M.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (4) : 701 - 715
  • [43] Cost-benefit analysis of software quality models
    Khoshgoftaar, TM
    Allen, EB
    Jones, WD
    Hudepohl, JP
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2001, 9 (01) : 9 - 30
  • [44] Smart Metering Cost-Benefit Analysis in Latvia
    Avotins, A.
    Kunickis, M.
    Bariss, U.
    Apse-Apsitis, P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2013, 2013, : 169 - 173
  • [45] A cost-benefit analysis of the thailand taxpayer survey
    Poapongsakorn, N
    Charnvitayapong, K
    Laovakul, D
    Suksiriserekul, S
    Dahlby, B
    INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2000, 7 (01) : 63 - 82
  • [46] Cost-benefit analysis of corrugated blast walls
    Lei, Han Yin
    Lee, Jong Chan
    Li, Chun Bao
    Ha, Yeon Chul
    Seo, Jung Kwan
    Kim, Bong Ju
    Paik, Jeom Kee
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2015, 10 (05) : 565 - 574
  • [47] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mixed Measurement Model
    Kawamura, Yoshinori
    JAPANESE ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 5 : 1 - 19
  • [48] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Software Quality Models
    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
    Edward B. Allen
    Wendell D. Jones
    John P. Hudepohl
    Software Quality Journal, 2001, 9 : 9 - 30
  • [49] Performing Cost-Benefit Analysis for Funding Projects
    Morosan-Danila, Lucia
    14TH ECONOMIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES OF TERRITORIES: INTERNATIONAL, COUNTRY, REGION, CITY, LOCATION CHALLENGES, 2018, : 396 - 405
  • [50] A multiple account framework for cost-benefit analysis
    Campbell, HF
    Brown, RPC
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2005, 28 (01) : 23 - 32