l Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, Kyung Mi [1 ]
Gwak, Mi Sook [2 ]
Choi, Soo Joo [2 ]
Kim, Myung Hee [2 ]
Park, Mi Hye [2 ]
Heo, Burn Young [2 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ Dongtan Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Hwaseong, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Arterial blood pressure; Cardiac output; Carotid endarterectomy; Fluid therapy; Stroke volume;
D O I
10.4097/kjae.2013.65.3.237
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: During carotid endarterectomy (CEA), hemodynamic stability and adequate fluid management are crucial to prevent perioperative cerebral stroke, myocardial infarction and hyperperfusion syndrome. Both pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), dynamic preload indices derived from the arterial waveform, are increasingly advocated as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA. Methods: Twenty seven patients undergoing CEA were enrolled in this study. PPV, SVV and cardiac output (CO) were measured before and after fluid loading of 500 ml of hydroxyethyl starch solution. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CO >= 15%. The ability of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Both PPV and SVV measured before fluid loading are associated with changes in CO caused by fluid expansion. The ROC analysis showed that PPV and SVV predicted response to volume loading (area under the ROC curve = 0.854 and 0.841, respectively, P < 0.05). A PPV >= 9.5% identified responders (Rs) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 90.9%, and a SVV >= 7.5% identified Rs with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 63.6%. Conclusions: Both PPV and SVV values before volume loading are associated with increased CO in response to volume expansion. Therefore, PPV and SVV are useful predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery
    Piccioni, Federico
    Bernasconi, Filippo
    Tramontano, Giulia T. A.
    Langer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2017, 31 (04) : 677 - 684
  • [2] A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery
    Federico Piccioni
    Filippo Bernasconi
    Giulia T. A. Tramontano
    Martin Langer
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017, 31 : 677 - 684
  • [3] Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation
    Perner, A.
    Faber, T.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (09) : 1068 - 1073
  • [4] Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery
    Jeong, Dae Myoung
    Ahn, Hyun Joo
    Park, Hyo Won
    Yang, Mikyung
    Kim, Jie Ae
    Park, Joohyun
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 125 (04) : 1158 - 1165
  • [6] A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Gaab Soo
    Han, Minsoo
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 63 (12) : 731 - 739
  • [7] Pressure controlled ventilation on stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients
    Ye, Weiguang
    Wang, Bin
    Wei, Limin
    Wang, Tianlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (06): : 10963 - 10970
  • [8] Use of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing patients to assess dynamic arterial elastance and to predict arterial pressure response to fluid administration
    M Cecconi
    MI Monge García
    M Gracia Romero
    J Mellinghoff
    F Caliandro
    RM Grounds
    A Rhodes
    Critical Care, 18 (Suppl 1):
  • [9] Pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position
    Kim, Do-Hyeong
    Shin, Seokyung
    Kim, Ji Young
    Kim, Seung Hyun
    Jo, Minju
    Choi, Yong Seon
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 1175 - 1183
  • [10] Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively
    Lahner, D.
    Kabon, B.
    Marschalek, C.
    Chiari, A.
    Pestel, G.
    Kaider, A.
    Fleischmann, E.
    Hetz, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (03) : 346 - 351