COMPARISON OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP AND AMERICAN-JOINT-COMMITTEE-ON-CANCER STAGING SYSTEMS AMONG PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER RECEIVING HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY - A REPORT OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP PROTOCOL 83-11

被引:0
作者
CURRAN, WJ
COX, JD
AZARNIA, N
BYHARDT, RW
SHIN, KH
EMANI, B
PHILLIPS, TL
SELIM, H
HERSKOVIC, A
MOHIUDDIN, M
AGER, PJ
KRISCH, R
DOGGETT, RLS
PAJAK, TJ
机构
[1] UNIV PENN, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 USA
[2] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[3] RADIAT THERAPY ONCOL GRP HEADQUARTERS, PHILADELPHIA, PA USA
[4] MED COLL WISCONSIN, MILWAUKEE, WI 53226 USA
[5] TOM BAKER CANC CLIN, CALGARY, ALBERTA, CANADA
[6] WASHINGTON UNIV, ST LOUIS, MO 63130 USA
[7] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143 USA
[8] METHODIST HOSP, BROOKLYN, NY 11215 USA
[9] WAYNE STATE UNIV, DETROIT, MI 48202 USA
[10] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 USA
[11] FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSP & MED CTR, FRESNO, CA USA
[12] RADIAT ONCOL CTR, SACRAMENTO, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(19910801)68:3<509::AID-CNCR2820680311>3.0.CO;2-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Since 1973, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has staged and stratified patients in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) protocols according to the RTOG staging system. In 1985, the American joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) revised its lung cancer staging system, with the principle differences from the RTOG system being the staging of involvement of the chest wall and of contralateral mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. To determine if the AJCC system discriminated outcome differently than the RTOG system in a nonoperative series, all 850 evaluable patients treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT) on the RTOG protocol 83-11 were restaged by the AJCC system. There was 67% agreement in patient distribution between the following comparable stages in each system: RTOG Stage II/AJCC Stage 11; RTOG Stage III/AJCC Stage IIIA; and RTOG Stage IV/AJCC Stage IIIB. Both systems successfully predicted for survival (P less than 0.001), although the RTOG staging was more discriminating (relative risk ratios, 1.59 versus 1.38). Among the 507 favorable patients (those with less than or equal to 5% weight loss and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 70 to 100), the RTOG staging was also more predictive (P = 0.004 versus P = 0.01). When RTOG Stage III (462 patients) was divided into those without contralateral mediastinal or hilar adenopathy (AJCC Stage II/IIIA) and those with (AJCC Stage IIIB), a significant survival (P = 0.0001) was noted with 2-year survival rates of 26% versus 4%, respectively. When AJCC Stage IIIA (348 patients) was divided into the patients without chest wall invasion (RTOG Stage II/III) and those with (RTOG Stage IV), a difference in 2-year survival of 22% versus 10% was observed (P = 0.002). Although both staging systems independently predict for survival, a fusion of both staging systems is the most discriminating of outcome. Future nonoperative studies in locally advanced NSCLC should stratify for contralateral nodal involvement (per AJCC staging) and chest wall invasion (per RTOG staging).
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL STAGING CANC
[2]  
BITRAN JD, 1986, CANCER, V57, P44, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860101)57:1<44::AID-CNCR2820570111>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-H
[4]  
BURKES R, 1989, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V8, P221
[5]  
CHOI NCH, 1981, CANCER, V48, P101, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810701)48:1<101::AID-CNCR2820480120>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-S
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]   A RANDOMIZED PHASE-I/II TRIAL OF HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY WITH TOTAL DOSES OF 60.0 GY TO 79.2 GY - POSSIBLE SURVIVAL BENEFIT WITH GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO 69.6 GY IN FAVORABLE PATIENTS WITH RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP STAGE-III NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CARCINOMA - REPORT OF RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP 83-11 [J].
COX, JD ;
AZARNIA, N ;
BYHARDT, RW ;
SHIN, KH ;
EMAMI, B ;
PAJAK, TF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (09) :1543-1555
[9]   LACK OF APPARENT DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOME BETWEEN CLINICALLY STAGED-IIIA AND STAGE-IIIB NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER TREATED WITH RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
CURRAN, WJ ;
STAFFORD, PM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (03) :409-415
[10]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS HIGH-DOSE RADIATION VERSUS RADIATION ALONE IN STAGE-III NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
DILLMAN, RO ;
SEAGREN, SL ;
PROPERT, KJ ;
GUERRA, J ;
EATON, WL ;
PERRY, MC ;
CAREY, RW ;
FREI, EF ;
GREEN, MR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (14) :940-945