Meta-Analytic Examination of the Base-Rate Fallacy

被引:18
作者
Allen, Mike [1 ]
Preiss, Raymond W. [2 ]
Gayle, Barbara Mae [3 ]
机构
[1] UW Milwaukee, Dept Commun, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Univ Puget Sound, Dept Speech Commun, Tacoma, WA 98416 USA
[3] Acad Affairs, St Martins Coll, Lacey, WA USA
关键词
Base Rate Fallacy; Evidence; Persuasion; Meta-analysis; Attitude Change;
D O I
10.1080/17464090500535863
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper is a meta-analytic review of the base-rate fallacy in persuasion research. The base-rate fallacy argues that individuals provided a set of statistical conclusions are unable to successfully utilize the statistical information when encountering contrary examples in a message. The meta-analysis provides empirical support for that claim. Results are discussed in the context of base-rate information versus an individuating narrative example. The potential consequences of these judgmental heuristics are applied to the assumptions and claims of the message sidedness/resistance to counterpersuasion literature.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Allen M., 1991, W J SPEECH COMMUNICA, V55, P390, DOI DOI 10.1080/10570319109374395
[2]  
Allen M., 1997, COMMUNICATION RES RE, V14, P125, DOI [10.1080/08824099709388654, DOI 10.1080/08824099709388654]
[3]  
Allen M, 1998, PERSUASION ADV METAA, P87
[4]   THE TEMPORAL EFFECTS OF STORY AND STATISTICAL EVIDENCE ON BELIEF CHANGE [J].
BAESLER, EJ ;
BURGOON, JK .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (05) :582-602
[5]  
Bar-Hillel M., 1975, THESIS
[6]   THE BASE-RATE FALLACY IN PROBABILITY JUDGMENTS [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1980, 44 (03) :211-233
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF ABSTRACT VS CONCRETE INFORMATION ON DECISIONS [J].
BORGIDA, E ;
NISBETT, RE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 7 (03) :258-271
[8]   THE UTILITY OF EXEMPLARS IN PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS [J].
BROSIUS, HB ;
BATHELT, A .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (01) :48-78
[9]  
Cacioppo J.T., 1981, ATTITUDES PERSUASION