A TEST TO MEASURE LIFT CAPACITY OF PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED ADULTS .2. REACTIVITY IN A PATIENT SAMPLE

被引:18
作者
MATHESON, LN
MOONEY, V
HOLMES, D
LEGGETT, S
GRANT, JE
NEGRI, S
HOLMES, B
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,PROGRAM OCCUPAT THERAPY,ST LOUIS,MO
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT ORTHOPAED,ORTHOMED PROGRAM,LA JOLLA,CA
关键词
DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL TEST; OUTCOME MEASURE; SPINAL IMPAIRMENT; TEST REACTIVITY; TREATMENT EFFECT;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199510000-00011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Test reactivity is the based on the idea that experience with a test may affect performance on subsequent tests, independent of what the test purports to measure. The reactivity of a test of lift capacity was studied in a single-blind randomized clinical trial in which subjects were assigned to one of two groups. One group received lift testing before and after a therapeutic trial, white the other group received lift testing only at the conclusion of the therapeutic trial. Objective, To measure the reactivity of a rift capacity test over the course of treatment. Summary of Background Data, The reactivity of a test is an important criterion by which an outcome measure must be judged. Change in response to treatment is assumed to be independent of changes resulting from the evaluee's experience with the test, although this is rarely addressed. Methods, The EPIC Lift Capacity test was administered to 55 patients with low back pain in a treatment program after they were randomized into a pre-test/post-test and a post-test only group. Additional measures were taken on a pre-test/post-test basis for all subjects. Results. Analyses of variance demonstrated no difference between the randomized groups after treatment. However, the pre-test/post-test group demonstrated significant improvement over the course of treatment. Other measures of outcome were similarly affected. Conclusion, The reactivity of the EPIC Lift Capacity test was negligible over an 8-week treatment regimen that did not include lifting tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:2130 / 2134
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Curtis L., Mayer T.G., Gatchel R.J., Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration.Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity, Spine, 19, pp. 401-405, (1994)
[2]  
Deyo R.A., Diehl A.K., Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain, Spine, 8, pp. 635-642, (1983)
[3]  
Deyo R.A., Conservative therapy for low back pain: Distinguishing useful from useless therapy, JAMA, 250, pp. 1057-1062, (1983)
[4]  
Deyo R.A., Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, pp. 1044-1053, (1988)
[5]  
Deyo R.A., Fads in the treatment of low back pain, N Engl J Med, 325, pp. 1039-1040, (1991)
[6]  
Deyo R.A., Practice variations, treatment fads, rising disability: Do we need a new clinical research paradigm?, Spine, 18, pp. 2153-2162, (1993)
[7]  
Fairbank J., Davies J., Couper J., O'Brien J., Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, Physiotherapy, 66, pp. 271-273, (1980)
[8]  
Golden N.S., An assessment of interrater reliability and intertest correlation of a progressive psychophysical lifting evaluation which measures occasional lifting capacity, (1990)
[9]  
Graves J.E., Pollock M.L., Carpenter D.M., Et al., Quantitative assessment of full range-of-motion isometric lumbar extension strength, Spine, 15, pp. 289-294, (1990)
[10]  
Griffin A.B., Troup J., Lloyd D., Tests of lifting and handling capacity: Their repeatability and relationship to back symptoms, Ergonomics, 27, pp. 305-320, (1984)