SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF SOFT BIFOCAL CONTACT-LENS PERFORMANCE

被引:15
作者
BULLIMORE, MA
JACOBS, RJ
机构
[1] School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA
[2] Department of Optometry, University of Auckland, Auckland
关键词
SOFT BIFOCAL CONTACT LENSES; VISUAL ACUITY; CORNEAL MODELING SYSTEM; VIDEO-KERATOGRAPHY; DIOPTRIC POWER VARIATION; PUPIL SIZE; DEFOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/00006324-199306000-00004
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Subjective and objective techniques were used to assess the on-eye performance of soft bifocal contact lenses. In the subjective technique a young observer whose accommodation had been paralyzed with a cycloplegic agent was fitted with the contact lens type under investigation and aligned with a Maxwellian view Badal optometer using a bite-bar. Visual acuity was measured as a function of both target vergence (0.00 to -4.00 D) and pupil size (1 to 5 mm). Aspheric, concentric, and diffractive soft bifocal contact lens designs were investigated. Diffractive and concentric bifocal designs with +2.00 D near additions showed ''twin peaks'' of visual acuity with one peak at 0.00 D target vergence (equivalent to distance viewing) and the second at -2.00 D target vergence (equivalent to a target at 50 cm). Some aspheric designs produced a relatively constant visual acuity across this vergence range, whereas others gave poor acuity at near. Visual acuity with the Echelon diffractive lens was relatively unaffected by pupil size, confirming theoretical predictions. Visual acuity with concentric designs was also relatively free of pupil size effects. In the objective technique, the variation in surface power across the lens was assessed using video-keratography. This technique provided an elegant means of visualizing the power profile of the lens. The location of the zones of increased power and the magnitude of power variations allowed an accurate prediction of the visual performance measured subjectively. Temporal displacement of lenses may explain the occasions where visual performance did not vary with pupil size.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Back A., Presbyopes and contact lenses: Is there hope?, Optician, 5, pp. 16-19, (1991)
[2]  
Charman W.N., Walsh G., Retinal images with centered, aspheric varifocal contact lenses, ICLC, 15, pp. 87-93, (1988)
[3]  
Klein S.A., Ho Y., Multizone bifocal contact lens design, SPIE 1986, 679, pp. 25-35
[4]  
Loshin D.S., The holographic/diffractive bifocal contact lens, ICLC, 16, pp. 77-86, (1989)
[5]  
McGill E., Ames K., Erickson P., Robboy M., Ouality of vision with hydrogel simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses, ICLC, 14, pp. 476-482, (1987)
[6]  
Saunders B.D., The optical performance of bifocal contact lenses, Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc, 6, pp. 71-74, (1989)
[7]  
Borish I.M., Pupil dependency of bifocal contact lenses, Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 65, pp. 417-423, (1988)
[8]  
Young G., Grey C.P., Papas E.B., Simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses: A comparative assessment of the in vitro optical performance, Optom Vis Sci, 67, pp. 339-345, (1990)
[9]  
Charman W.N., Saunders B., Theoretical and practical factors influencing the optical performance of contact lenses for the presbyope, J Br Contact Lens Assoc, 13, pp. 67-75, (1990)
[10]  
Waring I., Making sense of Keratospeak II: Proposed conventional terminology for corneal topography, Refract Corneal Surg, 5, pp. 362-367, (1989)