THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS FOR SOIL-SALINITY ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
HOSSEINI, E
GALLICHAND, J
MARCOTTE, D
机构
[1] UNIV LAVAL, FAC SCI AGR & ALIMENTAT, DEPT GENIE RURAL, QUEBEC CITY, PQ G1K 7P4, CANADA
[2] ECOLE POLYTECH, DEPT GENIE MINERAL, MONTREAL, PQ, CANADA
来源
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 1994年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
SPATIAL; INTERPOLATION; SOIL; SALINITY; KRIGING; GEOSTATISTICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Interpolation methods are required for analysis of soil salinity data by geographic information systems. This study was conducted to determine interpolation methods that are best suited to map soil salinity. Methods of closest neighbor, kriging, inverse-distance moving average, and thin plate smoothing splines were compared by cross-validation for precision and smoothing, using 341 measured values of electrical conductivity of saturated paste extract in a 16 000 ha area in southwest Iran. Interpolation precision of all methods were low, with a mean absolute difference between measured and predicted values ranging from 42 to 76% of the mean measured soil salinity. This was due to the large ratio of nugget effect to the sill of the variogram and to the high variability of data. Thin plate smoothing splines and ordinary kriging were the most precise methods, whereas closest neighbor was the least precise. The smoothing of the methods was assessed by comparing the dispersion standard deviation of interpolated values with that of observed values. The most precise methods were also those that performed an important smoothing. Ordinary kriging and thin plate smoothing splines produced contour maps that were much easier to interpret. A theoretical analysis of the performance of the methods (precision and smoothing) led to conclusions similar to those based on the cross-validation study Such a theoretical analysis can be used to select an appropriate interpolation method without the need for time consuming cross-validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1799 / 1807
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The differences in the interpolation methods for mapping spatial variability of soil properties
    Brodsky, L
    Vanek, V
    Bazalová, M
    Balík, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2001, 47 (12): : 529 - 535
  • [22] A DYNAMIC-MODEL OF SOIL-SALINITY AND DRAINAGE GENERATION IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE - A FRAMEWORK FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
    DINAR, A
    AILLERY, MP
    MOORE, MR
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (06) : 1527 - 1537
  • [23] Performance evaluation of spatial interpolation methods in the presence of noise
    Demirhan, M
    Özpinar, A
    Özdamar, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (06) : 1237 - 1258
  • [24] Estimating spatial variability of soil salinity using geostatistical methods
    Pozdnyakova, L
    Zhang, RD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, 1999, : 79 - 89
  • [25] Geostatistical methods to identify and map spatial variations of soil salinity
    Juan, P.
    Mateu, J.
    Jordan, M. M.
    Mataix-Solera, J.
    Melendez-Pastor, I.
    Navarro-Pedreno, J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2011, 108 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [26] Statistical methods for evaluating soil salinity spatial and temporal variability
    Douaik, Ahmed
    Van Meirvenne, Marc
    Toth, Tibor
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (05) : 1629 - 1635
  • [27] The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: A soil survey case study
    Brus, DJ
    DeGruijter, JJ
    Marsman, BA
    Visschers, R
    Bregt, AK
    Breeuwsma, A
    Bouma, J
    ENVIRONMETRICS, 1996, 7 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [28] Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties
    Robinson, TP
    Metternicht, G
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2006, 50 (02) : 97 - 108
  • [29] Spatial variability of soil properties determined by the interpolation methods in the agricultural lands
    Shahinzadeh, Noshin
    Babaeinejad, Teimour
    Mohsenifar, Kamran
    Ghanavati, Navid
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (04) : 4897 - 4907
  • [30] Spatial variability of soil properties determined by the interpolation methods in the agricultural lands
    Noshin Shahinzadeh
    Teimour Babaeinejad
    Kamran Mohsenifar
    Navid Ghanavati
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, 8 : 4897 - 4907