SYNTHETIC LIPID-ANCHORED RECEPTORS BASED ON THE BINDING-SITE OF A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY

被引:28
|
作者
EGGER, M [1 ]
HEYN, SP [1 ]
GAUB, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] TECH UNIV MUNICH,DEPT PHYS E22,W-8046 GARCHING,GERMANY
关键词
LIPID ANCHORED PROTEIN; FAB FRAGMENT; 2-DIMENSIONAL RECOGNITION PATTERN; MEMBRANE MIMETICS;
D O I
10.1016/0005-2736(92)90130-E
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Highly specific ligand receptor interactions generally characterize molecular recognition at cell surfaces and other biological systems. In this study we simulate a membrane receptor by fusing a monoclonal antibody fragment to a phospholipid. A sulfhydryl group in the hinge region of a monoclonal antibody fragment, was covalently linked to derivatives of phosphatidylethanolamines and phosphatidylserine via three different hydrophilic spacer arms. We investigated and characterized these lipid-anchored Fab-fragments which we have named 'Fab-lipids' in liposomal and monolayer systems. Methods for the monomolecular assembling of such films at the air/water interface and techniques used for their manipulation are outlined. We describe two possibilities for building a monomolecular receptor layer, consisting of two-dimensional pattern of oriented Fab-fragments with their artificial hydrophobic anchor embedded in a lipid matrix. In the first method a monomolecular film at the air/water interface was allowed to form from a vesicular suspension and driven into a phase separation, resulting in protein rich domains embedded in a protein depleted phase. This film was transferred onto a solid support in such a way that the established pattern was preserved. Alternatively, a recognition pattern was formed by directly cross-linking the Fab-fragments to preformed planar membranes composed of the reactive spacer-lipids and an inert matrix lipid. Specificity as well as contrast of the binding activity of the receptor layers were quantified using micro-fluorimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 54
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A MODEL OF THE BINDING-SITE OF AN ANTIPEPTIDE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY
    CHAMBERLIN, SG
    BROWN, JL
    ROBINSON, JA
    RICHARDS, NGJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 201 : 44 - MEDI
  • [2] BINDING-SITE OF THE RAT-LIVER SPECIFIC MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY
    SATO, K
    IKEDA, T
    OSADA, Y
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1988, 152 (03) : 1138 - 1143
  • [3] MAPPING BINDING-SITE OF A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY THAT PROBES THE ION CHANNEL OF THE ACCHR
    DONNELLYROBERTS, D
    MIHOVILOVIC, M
    RICHMAN, D
    MARTINEZCARRION, M
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 44 (03) : 476 - 476
  • [4] A MODELING ANALYSIS OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY PERCOLATION THROUGH TUMORS - A BINDING-SITE BARRIER
    FUJIMORI, K
    COVELL, DG
    FLETCHER, JE
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1990, 31 (07) : 1191 - 1198
  • [5] MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY DISTRIBUTION IN MICROSCOPIC TUMOR NODULES - CONSEQUENCES OF A BINDING-SITE BARRIER
    VANOSDOL, W
    FUJIMORI, K
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1992, 6 (01): : A42 - A42
  • [6] A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY DIRECTED AGAINST AN OPIATE BINDING-SITE IN RAT NEURAL MEMBRANES
    BIDLACK, JM
    DENTON, RR
    NEUROPEPTIDES, 1984, 5 (1-3) : 225 - 228
  • [7] IMMUNOLOGICAL MIMICRY BY A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY OF THE TRICYCLIC ANTI-DEPRESSANTS BINDING-SITE ON MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTORS
    MARULLO, S
    HOEBEKE, J
    GUILLET, JG
    ANDRE, C
    STROSBERG, AD
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1987, 138 (02): : 524 - 526
  • [8] BINDING-SITE OF ANTI-RHODOPSIN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY RH-29
    TOKUNAGA, F
    TAKAO, M
    IWASA, T
    TAKEUCHI, T
    ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1985, 2 (06) : 871 - 871
  • [9] A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY (MAB) TO ANTITHROMBIN-III (AT III) THAT RECOGNIZES THE HEPARIN BINDING-SITE
    WATTON, J
    BAINES, M
    LANE, DA
    BARROWCLIFFE, TW
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1991, 65 (06) : 914 - 914
  • [10] AN ANALYSIS OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY DISTRIBUTION IN MICROSCOPIC TUMOR NODULES - CONSEQUENCES OF A BINDING-SITE BARRIER
    VANOSDOL, W
    FUJIMORI, K
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1991, 51 (18) : 4776 - 4784