Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia

被引:29
作者
Sevinc, Baris [1 ]
Okus, Ahmet [2 ]
Ay, Serden [2 ]
Aksoy, Nergis [3 ]
Karahan, Omer [4 ]
机构
[1] Med Pk Usak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Usak, Turkey
[2] Karatay Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Konya, Turkey
[3] Konya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Konya, Turkey
[4] Usak Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Usak, Turkey
关键词
Incisional hernia; mesh repair; onlay; sublay;
D O I
10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an ideal treatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques. Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: onlay and sublay groups. Recurrences were evaluated by performing a physical examination. Results: The median follow-up was 37.1 (26.6 to 46.5) months. In the onlay group, the mean operation time was significantly shorter. However, in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications, the sublay group had significantly better results. The recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups (6% in the onlay group and 2% in the sublay group). Conclusion: In the treatment of incisional hernia, sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications. Both techniques have similar recurrence rates.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 20
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia - Results of an experts' meeting [J].
Korenkov, M ;
Paul, A ;
Sauerland, S ;
Neugebauer, E ;
Arndt, M ;
Chevrel, JP ;
Corcione, F ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Flament, JB ;
Kux, M ;
Matzinger, A ;
Myrvold, HE ;
Rath, AM ;
Simmermacher, RKJ .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 386 (01) :65-73
[12]  
Kurzer M, 2008, WORLD J SURG, V32, P31, DOI 10.1007/s00268-007-9118-z
[13]   Prognosis factors in incisional hernia surgery: 25 years of experience [J].
Langer C. ;
Schaper A. ;
Liersch T. ;
Kulle B. ;
Flosman M. ;
Füzesi L. ;
Becker H. .
Hernia, 2005, 9 (1) :16-21
[14]   A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia [J].
Luijendijk, RW ;
Hop, WCJ ;
van den Tol, P ;
de Lange, DCD ;
Braaksma, MMJ ;
Ijzermans, JNM ;
Boelhouwer, RU ;
de Vries, BC ;
Salu, MKM ;
Wereldsma, JCJ ;
Bruijninckx, CMA ;
Jeekel, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (06) :392-398
[15]   Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Mathes, Tim ;
Walgenbach, Maren ;
Siegel, Robert .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (04) :826-835
[16]   INCISIONAL HERNIA - A 10 YEAR PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF INCIDENCE AND ATTITUDES [J].
MUDGE, M ;
HUGHES, LE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (01) :70-71
[17]  
Paul A, 1998, EUR J SURG, V164, P361
[18]   Primary incisional hernia repair with or without polypropylene mesh: a report on 384 patients with 5-year follow-up [J].
Sauerland, S ;
Schmedt, CG ;
Lein, S ;
Leibl, BJ ;
Bittner, R .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2005, 390 (05) :408-412
[19]   One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study [J].
Venclauskas, L. ;
Maleckas, A. ;
Kiudelis, M. .
HERNIA, 2010, 14 (06) :575-582
[20]   Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair [J].
Vidović D. ;
Jurišsić D. ;
Franjić B.D. ;
Glavan E. ;
Ledinsky M. ;
Bekavac-Bešlin M. .
Hernia, 2006, 10 (4) :322-325