E-SHAP - INADEQUATE TREATMENT FOR POOR-PROGNOSIS RECURRENT LYMPHOMA

被引:17
作者
JOHNSON, PWM [1 ]
SWEETENHAM, JW [1 ]
MCCALLUM, P [1 ]
NORTON, AJ [1 ]
ROHATINER, AZS [1 ]
LISTER, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] SOUTHAMPTON GEN HOSP,CRC,WESSEX REG MED ONCOL UNIT,SOUTHAMPTON SO9 4XY,HANTS,ENGLAND
关键词
NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA; SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY; ETOPOSIDE; PLATINUM;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058364
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The treatment of refractory and recurrent lymphomas remains problematic, with the majority of patients showing no response to 'salvage' therapies. One regimen which has been suggested as showing particular efficacy is etoposide (40 mg/m2 daily x 4), cytosine arabinoside (2.0 g/m2 one dose), cisplatin (25 mg/m2/day infused over 4 days) and methylprednisolone (500 mg daily x 4) (E-SHAP). This study attempted to reproduce the encouraging results seen with this regimen in North America. Patients and methods: Twenty-eight patients with recurrent or refractory lymphoma were treated with E-SHAP given 3 to 4 weekly. Thirteen patients were treated at first recurrence and twenty-two had previously received etoposide. Results: No objective responses were seen although five patients had a transient reduction in tumour before regrowth despite continued treatment. Sixteen patients received further chemotherapy after failure of E-SHAP of whom four had responses. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression with over half the patients requiring hospital admission for neutropenia-associated fever. Median time to treatment failure was 2.5 months and median survival 7 months from the start of E-SHAP. Conclusions: These results are in marked contrast to those reported from North America, possibly due to differing patient selection. E-SHAP shows strictly limited efficacy but marked toxicity in the treatment of recurrent or refractory lymphomas with poor prognostic features.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, CANCER, V49, P2112
[2]   RESULTS OF MIME SALVAGE REGIMEN FOR RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY LYMPHOMA [J].
CABANILLAS, F ;
HAGEMEISTER, FB ;
MCLAUGHLIN, P ;
VELASQUEZ, WS ;
RIGGS, S ;
FULLER, L ;
SMITH, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (03) :407-412
[3]  
CABANILLAS F, 1982, BLOOD, V60, P693
[4]  
CAVALLI F, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P33
[5]  
COLOMBAT P, 1990, NOUV REV FR HEMATOL, V32, P183
[6]  
DEVITA VT, 1975, LANCET, V1, P248
[7]  
FISHER RI, 1987, SEMIN HEMATOL, V24, P21
[8]   FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR RESPONSE AND SURVIVAL [J].
GALLAGHER, CJ ;
GREGORY, WM ;
JONES, AE ;
STANSFELD, AG ;
RICHARDS, MA ;
DHALIWAL, HS ;
MALPAS, JS ;
LISTER, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (10) :1470-1480
[9]  
GERARDMA.R, 1974, LANCET, V2, P406
[10]   DEXAMETHASONE IFOSFAMIDE CISPLATIN ETOPOSIDE (DICE) AS THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED REFRACTORY NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF A PHASE-II STUDY [J].
GOSS, PE ;
SHEPHERD, FA ;
SCOTT, JG ;
WARNER, E ;
BAKER, MA ;
SUTTON, D ;
FARQUHARSON, HA ;
BUICK, S ;
SUTCLIFFE, S .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1991, 2 :43-46