NORMAL RANGE OF MOTION OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE - AN INITIAL GONIOMETRIC STUDY

被引:265
作者
YOUDAS, JW [1 ]
GARRETT, TR [1 ]
SUMAN, VJ [1 ]
BOGARD, CL [1 ]
HALLMAN, HO [1 ]
CAREY, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] MAYO SCH HLTH RELATED SCI,PHYS THERAPY PROGRAM,ROCHESTER,MN
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 1992年 / 72卷 / 11期
关键词
CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; KINESIOLOGY BIOMECHANICS; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE; TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/72.11.770
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purposes of this study were (1) to determine normal values for cervical active range of motion (AROM) obtained with a "cervical-range-of-motion" (CROM) instrument on healthy subjects whose ages spanned 9 decades, (2) to determine whether age and gender affect six cervical AROMs, and (3) to examine the intratester and intertester reliability of measurements obtained. Measurements were made on 337 subjects (171 females and 166 males) whose ages ranged from 11 to 97 years. Measurements were taken by five physical therapists with 7 to 30 years of clinical and teaching experience. Among male and female subjects of the same age, females bad a greater AROM than did males for all AROMs except neck flexion. Among both males and females, each of the six cervical AROMs decreased significantly with age From two pilot studies separate from the acquisition of the normal database, we determined our intratester and intertester reliabilities for making neck AROM measurements with the CROM instrument. We concluded that AROM measurements on the cervical spine with the CROM instrument demonstrated good intratester and intertester reliability, because the intraclass correlation coefficients were generally greater than .80.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 780
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF NECK MOTION A CLINICAL METHOD [J].
ALUND, M ;
LARSSON, SE .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (02) :87-91
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, JOINT MOTION METHOD
[3]  
BENNETT J G, 1963, J Am Phys Ther Assoc, V43, P45
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]  
BUCK C A, 1959, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, V40, P390
[6]  
Cole T.M., 1982, KRUSENS HDB PHYS MED, P19
[7]  
Defibaugh J. J., 1964, PHYS THER, V44, P163
[8]  
ENGELBERG AL, 1988, GUIDES EVALUATION PE, P71
[9]  
FERLIC D, 1962, B JOHNS HOPKINS HOSP, V110, P59
[10]  
Kottke F. J., 1953, B U MINN HOSP, V24, P470