The Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) When Used in a Sub-Acute Rehabilitation Setting with Older Adults

被引:26
作者
Thyer, Laura [1 ]
Brown, Ted [1 ]
Roe, Debbie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Dept Occupat Therapy, Bldg G,4th Floor,POB 527,Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Vic 3199, Australia
[2] Monash Hlth, Casey Hosp, Berwick, Vic, Australia
关键词
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; goal setting; client-centered; outcome measure; rehabilitation; validity;
D O I
10.1080/07380577.2018.1446233
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study investigated the validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) when included as one of the scales used by therapists with older adults on an inpatient sub-acute rehabilitation setting. Quantitative data from 36 participants in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting was obtained via the COPM, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) using a pre-post methodology. Pearson's r correlations and linear regression analyses were computed. The COPM Performance admission score was significantly correlated with the FIM Total and FIM Physical admission scores (p < .05) while the COPM Satisfaction admission score was significantly correlated with the FIM Total and FIM Physical admission scores (p < .05). The COPM Performance discharge score was significantly associated with the FIM Total, FIM Physical, and SF-36 Physical Health discharge scores (p < .01) while the COPM Satisfaction discharge scores was significantly associated with the FIM Total, FIM Physical, and SF-36 Physical Health discharge scores (p < .01) respectively. Linear regression analyses determined that the COPM's Performance admission score uniquely explained 8.4% of the SF-36 Physical Health discharge score's total variance (p < .05). The results contribute to the COPM's evidence base, supporting its convergent validity and predictive validity.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 153
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2020, NAT SAF QUAL HLTH SE
[2]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, AUSTR I HLTH WELF HL, V75
[3]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2013, DEV NAT CONS SUB NON
[4]  
Brown T., 2012, KIDS CAN BE KIDS CHI, P320
[5]  
Brown T., 2010, OCCUPATION CTR PRACT, P135
[6]  
Chenq Ya-Hsin, 2002, Occup Ther Int, V9, P167, DOI 10.1002/oti.163
[7]  
Chernick MR., 2007, BOOTSTRAP METHODS GU
[8]   Feasibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for routine use [J].
Colquhoun, Heather ;
Letts, Lori ;
Law, Mary ;
MacDermid, Joy ;
Edwards, Mary .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2010, 73 (02) :48-54
[9]   Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients [J].
Cup, EHC ;
Reimer, WJMSO ;
Thijssen, MCE ;
van Kuyk-Minis, MAH .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (04) :402-409
[10]   Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury [J].
Donnelly, C ;
Eng, JJ ;
Hall, J ;
Alford, L ;
Giachino, R ;
Norton, K ;
Kerr, DS .
SPINAL CORD, 2004, 42 (05) :302-307