CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT PHILOSOPHY, LAW AND ECOLOGY

被引：1

作者：

Barretto, Vicente de Paulo ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]}

Beltrami, Fabio ^{[7
,8
]}

机构：

[1] PUCRJ, Filosofia, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

[2] UNESA, Programa Posgrad Direito, Kota Sby, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

[3] Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos, Programa Posgrad Direito, Sao Leopoldo, RS, Brazil

[4] Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos, Escola Direito, Sao Leopoldo, RS, Brazil

[5] Univ Coimbra, Fac Direito, P-3000 Coimbra, Portugal

[6] Int Assoc Law Sch, Board Governors, Pune, Maharashtra, India

[7] Ctr Ensino Super Cenecista Farroupilha CNEC Farro, Farroupilha, RS, Brazil

[8] FSG, Caxias Do Sul, RS, Brazil

来源：

QUAESTIO IURIS | 2016年 / 9卷 / 03期

关键词：

Anthropocentrism; Ecology; Solidary Responsibility; Law; Nature;

D O I：

10.12957/rqi.2016.22345

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The relationship between man and nature have always been subject of inquiry in various prospects, from religion to science. How to relate these two poles, from the human behavioral relation to the prospect of law, in a convergent point is a challenge to human reflection. It is on this basis that this article was developed. Tools to face this challenge resulting from the analysis of three perspectives of thinking which deal differently with the relationship between man and nature, which are, anthropocentrism, ecology and solidary responsibility. As it seeks to demonstrate, it is in this latter that seems to us the best reason about the theme.

引用

页码：1474 / +

页数：24

共 11 条

[1]

BACON Francis, 1955, NEW ATLANTIS F BACON, P1617

[2]

Eckersley R, 1992, ENV POLITICAL THEORY

[3]

Ferry L, 2009, NOVA ORDEM ECOLOGICA

[4]

Jonas H., 2006, PRINCIPIO RESPONSABI

[5]

NAESS A., 1976, SHALLOW DEEP LONG RA

[6]

OST Francois, 1995, NATUREZA MARGEM LEI

[7]

OST Francois, 2003, NATURE HORS LOI LECO

[8]

RICOEUR P, 1991, POSTFACE TEMPS RESPO

[9]

Stone Christopher D., 2010, SHOULD TREES HAVE ST

[10]

THOMAS Keith, 2010, HOMEM MUNDO NATURAL

← 1 2 →