Database integration in bibliometric studies: the Brazilian scientific production in Zika

被引：1

作者：

de Menezes Alencar, Maria Simone ^{[1
]}

Bochner, Rosany ^{[2
]}

Amaral, Daniel Giacometti ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Estado Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

[2] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

[3] NanoBusiness Informacao & Inovacao Ltda, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

来源：

EM QUESTAO | 2018年 / 24卷

关键词：

Bibliometrics; Databases; Zika; Information Sources;

D O I：

10.19132/1808-5245240.13-28

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Based on the case study of the Brazilian scientific production involving Zika virus, this article aims to discuss the importance of integrating different data sources to better represent the landscape of the research, highlighting how the restriction of sources impacts the results of a bibliometric analysis. Four scientific databases of peer-reviewed literature were used to identify the scientific production of Brazilian authors related to Zika virus: Web of Science and Scopus as two general sources; PubMed as a specific database related to the field of the study; and SciELO as a database with a more regional focus. The analysis of the results indicates the relevance of integrating different databases in bibliometric studies in order to mitigate distortions and provide a consistent vision of the scientific research landscape in a certain field.

引用

页码：13 / 28

页数：16

共 21 条

[1]

ARAUJO Kizi Mendonca, 2017, RECIIS REV ELETRON C, V11

[2]

ARAUJO Kizi Mendonca, 2016, ENCONTRO NACL DE PES

[3] Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and Scopus [J].

Archambault, Eric ;

Campbell, David ;

Gingras, Yves ;

Lariviere, Vincent .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (07) :1320-1326

[4]

Burnham Judy F, 2006, Biomed Digit Libr, V3, P1

[5]

Bueno FTC, 2017, HIST CIENC SAUDE-MAN, V24, P1161, DOI [10.1590/s0104-59702017000500017, 10.1590/S0104-59702017000500017]

[6] Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses [J].

Falagas, Matthew E. ;

Pitsouni, Eleni I. ;

Malietzis, George A. ;

Pappas, Georgios .

FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) :338-342

[7] Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study [J].

Gavel, Ylva ;

Iselid, Lars .

ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2008, 32 (01) :8-21

[8]

GHENO Ediane Maria, 2016, ENCONTRO BRASILEIRO, pA26

[9]

GHENO Ediane Maria, 2017, REUNIAO ANUAL SBPC, P1

[10] Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison [J].

Harzing, Anne-Wil ;

Alakangas, Satu .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (02) :787-804

← 1 2 3 →