AUDITORY DETECTION OF THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE

被引:0
作者
KIDD, G
BURKARD, RF
MASON, CR
机构
[1] Dept of Communication Disorders, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH | 1993年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
BAER; AUDITORY MONITORING; APPLIED PSYCHOACOUSTICS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; COMPLEX SOUND PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1044/jshr.3602.442
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
The human brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) is a far-field electrical potential recorded from the scalp in response to transient acoustic stimuli. Typically, voltage measurements are obtained for a period of about 10 msec following the acoustic stimulus, which is repeated and summed several hundred or thousand times to permit extraction of the response from ongoing nonauditory neural activity. The judgment about whether a response has been obtained is normally based on the pattern observed in a visual display of the waveform. In this study, we investigated whether listeners can distinguish BAERs elicited by acoustic clicks from control waveforms obtained with no acoustic stimulus when the waveforms were presented auditorily. For this purpose, BAER and control waveforms were transduced by an earphone and used in an auditory detection task. Several presentation strategies were examined, including lengthening the waveform by playing it at a lower sampling rate, playing the waveform repetitively, and using the waveform to frequency modulate a pure-tone carrier. The results indicated that the BAER, when extended in duration and used to frequency modulate a 1000-Hz pure tone, was highly detectable in a YES-NO paradigm for BAERs elicited with high-level (e.g., 70 dB re. behavioral detection threshold) acoustic clicks. Performance declined to near chance as the level of the BAER-eliciting stimulus was lowered to 10 dB. In general, detection performance for stimuli presented visually was slightly, but consistently, superior to that which occurred for stimuli presented auditorily.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 447
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Modified Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Patients With Intracranial Mass Lesions [J].
Stone, James L. ;
Fino, John ;
Patel, Ketan ;
Calderon-Arnulphi, Mateo ;
Suss, Nichole ;
Hughes, John R. .
CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 43 (04) :291-302
[32]   Brain stem auditory-evoked potentials of mice with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis [J].
Watanabe, T ;
Cheng, KC ;
Krug, MS ;
Yoo, TJ .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1996, 105 (11) :905-915
[33]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE LATENCIES AND BEHAVIORAL THRESHOLDS IN NORMAL-HEARING INFANTS AND ADULTS [J].
WERNER, LA ;
FOLSOM, RC ;
MANCL, LR .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1994, 77 (1-2) :88-98
[34]   Effect of suxamethonium on the auditory evoked response in humans [J].
Brunner, MD ;
Nathwani, D ;
Rich, PA ;
Thornton, C ;
Dore, CJ ;
Newton, DEF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :34-37
[35]   Brainstem auditory evoked response in neonatal neurology [J].
Wilkinson, Andrew R. ;
Jiang, Ze D. .
SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 11 (06) :444-451
[36]   EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE AUDITORY-EVOKED RESPONSE [J].
HETT, DA ;
SMITH, DC ;
PILKINGTON, SN ;
ABBOTT, TR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (04) :P487-P487
[37]   Effects of Deliberate Ingestion of Organophosphate or Paraquat on Brain Stem Auditory-Evoked Potentials [J].
Jayasinghe S.S. ;
Pathirana K.D. .
Journal of Medical Toxicology, 2011, 7 (4) :277-280
[38]   AUDITORY-EVOKED RESPONSE AND PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA [J].
OKELLY, SW ;
SMITH, DC ;
PILKINGTON, SN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (05) :P719-P720
[39]   Diagnostic accuracy of brain stem auditory evoked response in distinguishing drug-induced parkinsonism from Parkinson'sdisease [J].
Nikmanesh, Najmeh ;
Sarani, Ebrahim Moghimi ;
Khazraei, Samaneh ;
Petramfar, Peyman ;
Ostovan, Vahid Reza .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (06) :524-532
[40]   BRAIN-STEM ACOUSTIC EVOKED-POTENTIALS RECORDED FROM THE HUMAN MESENCEPHALON [J].
LANDI, A ;
COLOMBO, F .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 57 (04) :167-174