PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN SERBIA: FROM IMITATION TO STATUS QUO

被引:3
作者
Janicijevic, Nebojsa [1 ]
Milikic, Biljana Bogicevic [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Econ, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
public management; public administration; institutional changes; downsizing;
D O I
10.2298/SOC1104433J
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Public management in Serbia has been experiencing reform changes since 2000. In this paper we attempt to analyze reforms in public management in Serbia during the period 2000-2010 from two theoretical frameworks: the institutional changes perspective and the downsizing perspective. We believe that the selected time frame is suitable for our research, since the period of ten years is long enough for radical changes to take place. The analysis from the institutional changes perspective suggests that the success in creating the new state administration institutional model in Serbia will greatly depend on the amount of pressure put by the European Union and IMF on the Serbian Government, but also on raising the level of knowledge and competence for conducting necessary changes in the Serbian state administration. The analysis from the downsizing perspective reveals that efforts aimed at downsizing of public administration in Serbia, initiated by the need to achieve results quickly, have almost been blocked by strong forces towards maintaining the status quo.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 452
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STRATEGIC HUMAN RESO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MANAGEMENT RES NEWS, DOI DOI 10.1108/01409170810876071
[3]   Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector [J].
Ashworth, Rachel ;
Boyne, George ;
Delbridge, Rick .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2009, 19 (01) :165-187
[4]  
Berger Peter L., 1966, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[5]   The attitudinal legacy of communist labor relations [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Freeman, RB .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1997, 50 (03) :438-459
[6]   Running government like a business - Implications for public administration theory and practice [J].
Box, RC .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 29 (01) :19-43
[7]   Public and private management: What's the difference? [J].
Boyne, GA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (01) :97-122
[8]   Process perspectives on policy change: Highlighting implementation [J].
Brinkerhoff, DW .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 24 (09) :1395-1401
[9]  
Brown Kerry., 2004, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V6, P303, DOI [10.1080/1471903042000256501, DOI 10.1080/1471903042000256501]
[10]  
Cameron K. S., 1993, ORG CHANGE DESIGN