Examining Sexuality Education Preferences Among Youth at Risk for Poor Sexual Health Outcomes Based on Social Determinants of Health Factors

被引:3
作者
Wilson, Kelly L. [1 ]
Maness, Sarah B. [2 ]
Thompson, Erika L. [3 ]
Rosen, Brittany L. [4 ]
McDonald, Skye [4 ]
Wiley, David C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hlth & Kinesiol, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Hlth & Exercise Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Community & Family Hlth, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Human Serv, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Texas State Univ, Dept Hlth & Human Performance, San Marcos, TX USA
关键词
Social Determinants of Health; adolescent health; sexuality education;
D O I
10.1080/15546128.2018.1447414
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
At-risk adolescents may experience Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) that lead to higher rates of risky sexual behavior, including increased risk of pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. These SDoH may include components such as unstable family structures, incomplete education, and poverty. Targeting at-risk youth for sexuality education is one way to work toward decreasing sexual health disparities. However, preferences for sexuality education approaches may differ among at-risk youth by additional factors including sex and sexual orientation. The purpose of this study was to describe sexuality education preferences among at-risk youth and how sexuality education preferences differ based on sex and sexual orientation in an at-risk sample of high school-aged youth in Texas. Results indicate sexuality education preferences differ based on sex and sexual orientation when examined by sexual health topics and methods of delivery. Implications of this study indicate including at-risk youth in sexual health programs may be a way to target those at-risk of adverse SDoH, but these groups also have specific preferences for sexuality education.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Buston K., 2002, SEX ED, V2, P233, DOI DOI 10.1080/1468181022000025794
[2]  
Buston K., 2006, SEX ED, V6, P135, DOI DOI 10.1080/14681810600578818
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, 2013 SEX TRANSM DIS
[4]   How gay and bisexual men compensate for the lack of meaningful sex education in a socially conservative state [J].
Currin, Joseph M. ;
Hubach, Randolph D. ;
Durham, Andre R. ;
Kavanaugh, Katherine E. ;
Vineyard, Zachary ;
Croff, Julie M. .
SEX EDUCATION-SEXUALITY SOCIETY AND LEARNING, 2017, 17 (06) :667-681
[5]  
di Mauro Diane., 2007, SEXUALITY RES SOCIAL, V4, P67, DOI [10.1525/srsp.2007.4.1.67, DOI 10.1525/SRSP.2007.4.1.67]
[6]   "If There's One Benefit, You're not Going to Get Pregnant": the Sexual Miseducation of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Individuals [J].
Estes, Michelle L. .
SEX ROLES, 2017, 77 (9-10) :615-627
[7]  
Future of Sex Education Initiative, 2012, NAT SEX ED STAND COR
[8]   Health insurance coverage, health care-seeking behaviors, and genital chlamydial infection prevalence in sexually active young adults [J].
Geisler, William M. ;
Chyu, Laura ;
Kusunoki, Yasamin ;
Upchurch, Dawn M. ;
Hook, Edward W. .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2006, 33 (06) :389-396
[9]   "Is This Normal? Is This Not Normal? There Is No Set Example": Sexual Health Intervention Preferences of LGBT Youth in Romantic Relationships [J].
Greene, George J. ;
Fisher, Kimberly A. ;
Kuper, Laura ;
Andrews, Rebecca ;
Mustanski, Brian .
SEXUALITY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2015, 12 (01) :1-14
[10]  
Hilton G. L., 2005, BRIT ED RES ASS ANN