Paying for Environmental Results is WTO Compliant

被引:10
作者
Hasund, Knut Per [1 ]
Johansson, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Board Agr, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1746-692X.12110
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Results-based payments can be compatible with WTO and CAP rules. They could accordingly replace some of the present agri-environmental payment schemes based on complying with conditions about management practices. Value-based payments are permitted by the WTO but not by the CAP, at least not if the payments exceed the additional costs of producing the environmental service, including income foregone. If the payment exceeds the extra cost or loss of income the scheme is not exempt on WTO green box grounds but the sum of such schemes is likely to fit below the EU ceiling on non-exempt support. The EU has large margins below its amber box ceiling. Value-based payments can be differentiated according to the quantity or quality of delivered environmental services: the higher the environmental value, the higher the payment. The present agri-environmental payments of the CAP are cost based and the EU classifies them as meeting the WTO green box of minimally trade and production distorting support. They are therefore not subject to the EU's WTO ceiling on non-exempt support. The reason to convert to results-based or value-based payments is that they are potentially significantly more efficient than the existing management-based and cost-based payments.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change
    Burton, Rob J. F.
    Schwarz, G.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) : 628 - 641
  • [2] Hasund K. P., 2015, 201512 SWED BOARD AG
  • [3] Keenleyside C., 2014, ENVBSETU20130046 EUR
  • [4] How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-environmental measures?-An empirical analysis in Germany
    Matzdorf, Bettina
    Lorenz, Jana
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (02) : 535 - 544
  • [5] Implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of a payment scheme for environmental services from agricultural land
    Ulber, Lena
    Klimek, Sebastian
    Steinmann, Horst-Henning
    Isselstein, Johannes
    Groth, Markus
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) : 464 - 472
  • [6] Spatially uniform versus spatially heterogeneous compensation payments for biodiversity-enhancing land-use measures
    Wätzold, F
    Drechsler, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 31 (01) : 73 - 93
  • [7] WTO World Trade Organization, 1995, RES UR ROUND MULT TR, P39