EFFECTS OF FILTRATION, COLLIMATION, AND TARGET-RECEPTOR DISTANCE ON ARTIFICIAL APPROXIMAL ENAMEL LESION DETECTION WITH THE USE OF RADIOVISIOGRAPHY

被引:5
作者
PARKS, ET [1 ]
MILES, DA [1 ]
VANDIS, ML [1 ]
WILLIAMSON, GF [1 ]
RAZMUS, TF [1 ]
BRICKER, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] W VIRGINIA HLTH SCI CTR, SCH DENT, DEPT DIAGNOST SCI, CHARLESTON, WV USA
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 1994年 / 77卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0030-4220(94)90207-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
RadioVisioGraphy is an imaging modality that uses a charge-coupled device electronic sensor. Dental charge-coupled device imaging can be used to detect dental caries; however, it was not known what effect beam collimation, added filtration, or variable target-receptor distance has on this task. The purpose of this investigation was to study these effects and to compare RadioVisioGraphy images with E-speed radiographs. Human teeth with mechanically created proximal defects were imaged by conventional radiography and RadioVisioGraphy varying exposure time, target-receptor distance, collimation, and filtration. Printed RadioVisioGraphy images without enhancement and E-speed radiographs were evaluated by five viewers. The number of true-positives and false-positives were compared as were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and entrance level radiation exposure. Added filtration reduced the false-positives regardless of collimation or target-receptor distance. True-positives and false-positives were greater at a target-receptor distance of 8 inch at exposures < 0.10 seconds (F < 0.0151). E-speed radiographs had a greater specificity and positive predictive value than RadioVisioGraphy images without image enhancement; however, no significant differences were found between RadioVisioGraphy images and E-speed radiographs in true-positive or false-positive identifications without image enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 426
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF THE NEW RADIOVISIOGRAPHY SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY [J].
BENZ, C ;
MOUYEN, F .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1991, 72 (05) :627-631
[2]   ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE VALUE AS MEASURES OF IMAGING TEST-PERFORMANCE [J].
BEYTAS, EM ;
DEBATIN, JF ;
BLINDER, RA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (05) :374-378
[3]   QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF PARALLELING LONG-CONE AND BISECTION-OF-ANGLE PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BIGGERSTAFF, RH ;
PHILLIPS, JR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1976, 41 (05) :673-677
[4]   DEFINITION OF TERMS USED TO JUDGE THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - A GRAPHIC APPROACH [J].
BRISMAR, J ;
JACOBSSON, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :621-623
[5]  
Brooks S L, 1993, Dent Clin North Am, V37, P91
[6]   NEW APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS [J].
DEBELDER, M ;
BOLLEN, R ;
DUVILLE, R .
JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1971, 19 (05) :126-&
[7]  
GOAZ PW, 1987, ORAL RADIOLOGY PRINC, P35
[8]   RADIOGRAPHIC DETECTION OF RECURRENT CARIOUS LESIONS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
GOSHIMA, T ;
GOSHIMA, Y .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1990, 70 (02) :236-239
[9]   RADIOVISIOGRAPHY - AN INITIAL EVALUATION [J].
HORNER, K ;
SHEARER, AC ;
WALKER, A ;
WILSON, NHF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 168 (06) :244-248
[10]  
Horton P S, 1983, J Dent Educ, V47, P771