Software tool for physics chart checks

被引:17
作者
Li, H. Harold [1 ]
Wu, Yu [1 ]
Yang, Deshan [1 ]
Mutic, Sasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 4921 Parkview Pl,Campus Box 8224, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2014.03.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Physics chart check has long been a central quality assurance (QC) measure in radiation oncology. The purpose of this work is to describe a software tool that aims to accomplish simplification, standardization, automation, and forced functions in the process. Methods and materials: Nationally recognized guidelines, including American College of Radiology and American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines and technical standards, and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group reports were identified, studied, and summarized. Meanwhile, the reported events related to physics chart check service were analyzed using an event reporting and learning system. A number of shortfalls in the chart check process were identified. To address these problems, a software tool was designed and developed under Microsoft. Net in C# to hardwire as many components as possible at each stage of the process. Results: The software consists of the following 4 independent modules: (1) chart check management; (2) pretreatment and during treatment chart check assistant; (3) posttreatment chart check assistant; and (4) quarterly peer-review management. The users were a large group of physicists in the author's radiation oncology clinic. During over 1 year of use the tool has proven very helpful in chart checking management, communication, documentation, and maintaining consistency. Conclusions: The software tool presented in this work aims to assist physicists at each stage of the physics chart check process. The software tool is potentially useful for any radiation oncology clinics that are either in the process of pursuing or maintaining the American College of Radiology accreditation. (C) 2014 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E217 / E225
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ACR Committee for Radiation Oncology Practice Accreditation, RAD ONC PRACT ACCR P
[2]  
Dansereau RE, 2010, MISADMINISTRATIONS E
[3]   Quality Control Quantification (QCQ): A Tool to Measure the Value of Quality Control Checks in Radiation Oncology [J].
Ford, Eric C. ;
Terezakis, Stephanie ;
Souranis, Annette ;
Harris, Kendra ;
Gay, Hiram ;
Mutic, Sasa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03) :E263-E269
[4]  
Furhang E, 2009, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS, V10, P2855
[5]   Improving safety in radiation oncology [J].
Hayman, James A. .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 1 (01) :15-15
[6]   Medical Physics Letter Improving patient safety in radiation oncology [J].
Hendee, William R. ;
Herman, Michael G. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (01) :78-82
[7]   Safety considerations for IGRT: Executive summary [J].
Jaffray, David A. ;
Langen, Katja M. ;
Mageras, Gikas ;
Dawson, Laura A. ;
Yan, Di ;
Adams, Robert ;
Mundt, Arno J. ;
Fraass, Benedick .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 3 (03) :167-170
[8]   COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40 [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
COIA, L ;
GILLIN, M ;
HANSON, WF ;
LEIBEL, S ;
MORTON, RJ ;
PALTA, JR ;
PURDY, JA ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
SVENSSON, GK ;
WELLER, M ;
WINGFIELD, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :581-618
[9]   The challenge of maximizing safety in radiation oncology [J].
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Jackson, Marianne ;
Xie, Liyi ;
Chang, Sha X. ;
Burkhardt, Katharin Deschesne ;
Mazur, Lukasz ;
Jones, Ellen L. ;
Saponaro, Patricia ;
LaChapelle, Dana ;
Baynes, Dee C. ;
Adams, Robert D. .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 1 (01) :2-14
[10]   Quantitative Metrics for Assessing Plan Quality [J].
Moore, Kevin L. ;
Brame, R. Scott ;
Low, Daniel A. ;
Mutic, Sasa .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) :62-69