RESPECT TOWARDS ELDERLY DEMENTED PATIENTS

被引:2
作者
Sensen, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Philosophy, 105J Newcomb Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Liberal Arts, 105J Newcomb Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
来源
DIAMETROS | 2014年 / 39卷
关键词
Kant; respect; elderly; demented; dementia;
D O I
10.13153/diam.39.2014.567
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
One question of applied ethics is the status and proper treatment of marginal cases, i.e., of people who are not yet or not anymore in full possession of their rational capacities, such as elderly demented people. Does one belittle them if one does not treat them like normal human adults, or would it be disrespectful and demanding too much if one did? Are elderly demented even the proper object of respect? In this paper I explore what Kant would say about these questions if he had addressed them. I look at what Kantian respect is, how he justifies the requirement to respect others, and what it demands more specifically. My claim is that Kant conceives of respect as a maxim of not exalting oneself above others. One should adopt this attitude independently of what the other is like. Differences between normal human adults and marginal cases are important for how one should treat them, but ultimately not for the question of why one should treat them with respect. Accordingly, elderly demented people should be respected, and it depends on the individual case what kind of actions this implies.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 124
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Allison H., 2011, KANTS GROUNDWORK MET, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691531.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199691531.001.0001]
[2]  
Allison H., 2002, I KANT THEORETICAL P, P271
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANIMAL RIGHTS HUMAN
[4]   A Contractualist Reading of Kant's Proof of the Formula of Humanity [J].
Cureton, Adam .
KANTIAN REVIEW, 2013, 18 (03) :363-386
[5]  
Darwall S., 1979, ETHICS, P36
[6]  
Engstrom S., 2009, FORM PRACTICAL KNOWL
[7]  
Formosa P., PHILOS FORU IN PRESS
[8]  
Goy Ina, 2013, KANTS TUGENDLEHRE, P183
[9]  
Gregor M., 1996, PRACTICAL PHILOS, P605
[10]  
Guyer P., 1997, KRV CRITIQUE PURE RE