Science Education and Student Autonomy

被引:3
作者
Melville, Wayne [1 ]
Kerr, Donald [2 ]
Verma, Geeta [3 ]
Campbell, Todd [4 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Fac Educ, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
[2] Lakehead Univ, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Hartford, CT 06112 USA
关键词
Autonomy; Epistemic agents; Evidence; Power; Science education;
D O I
10.1007/s42330-018-0011-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine how the concept of autonomy may be construed as a foundational value which underpins students' coherent sensemaking of how the physical world operates. Autonomy and science both require students to comprehend and assess the quality of evidence, claims, and alternative outcomes. Further, participation in scientific sensemaking affords opportunities for dialogue, agency, and power, while autonomy stresses a concern for the quality of both the decisions that students arrive at regarding themselves, their participation in the scientific enterprise, and the reasoning behind their decisions. In particular, we focus on how autonomy provides a foundation for the education of students as "epistemic agents." Our work indicates that the development of students' autonomy is predicated on carefully examining and challenging traditional power relationships found within classrooms. By pursuing the goal of autonomy, and challenging the entrenched power relationships oft found in science education, we argue that science education can become more meaningful, and accessible, to more students.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ackerman Bruce, 1980, SOCIAL JUSTICE LIBER
[2]  
AIKENHEAD GS, 1990, FOUNDATIONS OF LITERACY POLICY IN CANADA, P127
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SKILLS ARGUMENT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511814273.035
[4]  
Australian Academy of Science, 2017, SCI BY DOING
[5]  
Bailin S., 2003, BLACKWELL GUIDE PHIL, P181
[6]  
Barton AC, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P871
[7]   Critical thinking, autonomy and practical reason [J].
Cuypers, SE .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (01) :75-90
[8]  
Ervin-Tripp S., 1984, LANGUAGE POWER, P116
[9]  
Fittell D., 2010, 2010 ANN C AUSTR SCI
[10]   A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning [J].
Ford, Michael J. .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2012, 30 (03) :207-245