Blockchain and smart contracts: the missing link in copyright licensing?

被引:68
作者
Bodo, Balazs [1 ,2 ]
Gervais, Daniel [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Quintais, Joao Pedro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat Law IViR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] IViRs Blockchain & Soc Policy Res Lab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Informat Law, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Law, Law, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Intellectual Property Program, Nashville, TN USA
[6] ATRIP, Nashville, TN USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 26卷 / 04期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Blockchain; copyright; smart contracts; distributed ledger technology (DLT); copyright registries; automated licensing; digital rights management (DRM);
D O I
10.1093/ijlit/eay014
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article offers a normative analysis of key blockchain technology concepts from the perspective of copyright law. Some features of blockchain technologies-scarcity, trust, transparency, decentralized public records and smart contracts-seem to make this technology compatible with the fundamentals of copyright. Authors can publish works on blockchain creating a quasi-immutable record of initial ownership, and encode 'smart' contracts to license the use of works. Remuneration may happen on online distribution platforms where the smart contracts reside. In theory, such an automated setup allows for the private ordering of copyright. Blockchain technology, like Digital Rights Management 20 years ago, is thus presented as an opportunity to reduce market friction, and increase both licensing efficiency and the autonomy of creators. Yet, some of the old problems remain. The article examines the differences between new, smart-contract-based private ordering regime and the fundamental components of copyright law, such as exceptions and limitations, the doctrine of exhaustion, restrictions on formalities, the public domain and fair remuneration.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 336
页数:26
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Gerard D, 2017, HYPEBOT
[22]  
Gerard D, 2017, ATTACK 50 FOOT BLOCK
[23]  
Gervais D, 2011, VAND L REV EN BANC, V64, P147
[24]  
Gervais D, 2016, COLLECTIVE MANAGEMEN, P3
[25]  
GERVAIS Daniel, 2013, BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY, V28, P13
[26]  
Gervais Daniel, 2018, EUR INTELL PROP R, V6, P349
[27]  
Giblin R, 2011, CODE WARS: 10 YEARS OF P2P SOFTWARE LITIGATION, P1
[28]  
Ginsburg Jane C, 2018, COLUMBIA J LAW ARTS, V41, P153
[29]  
GINSBURG JC, 2015, BERKELEY TECH LJ, V29, P1383
[30]  
Goldenfein J, 2017, COLUMBIA J LAW ARTS, V41