ON THE ACTIVE FORM OF 4-AMINOPYRIDINE - BLOCK OF K+ CURRENTS IN RABBIT SCHWANN-CELLS

1. The blocking action of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) on the outward potassium currents evoked by depolarization of rabbit Schwann cells in short-term primary culture was studied with the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp method. 2. We have determined the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant, K, for the action of 4-AP to block potassium currents at a series of different extracellular and intracellular pH values. 4-Aminopyridine is an organic base and exists in both charged and uncharged forms in aqueous solution. Changes in the pH of the extracellular and intracellular solutions therefore also change the extracellular and intracellular proportions of these two forms, and the values of K that were obtained were found to depend in a consistent way on both the extracellular and the intracellular pH. 3. At alkaline extracellular pH, K was decreased. At acidic extracellular pH, K was increased. In contrast, increasing the intracellular pH from 7.2 to 8.1 reduced the apparent potency of extracellularly applied 4-AP (i.e. increased K), and decreasing the intracellular pH (to 6.4) increased this apparent potency (i.e. decreased K). 4. The 4-AP analogues, 2-aminopyridine, 3-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine, were also tested. At half-block of the potassium current, the intracellular concentration of the cationic form of the various amino pyridines (applied extracellularly at pH 7.2) varied by a factor of less than five, whereas that of the uncharged form varied by a factor of over 700. 5. The results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that the cationic form of the amiopyridines, acting from the extracellular solution, contributes in any substantial way to potassium channel block. It also seems unlikely that the uncharged form, acting either extracellularly or intracellularly, is solely responsible for the block. However, the results as a whole are consistent with he idea that it is the cation acting from the intracellular side that blocks the 4-AP-sensitive potassium channel and that the affinity with which 4-AP blocks the channel depends on the intracellular pH. The results would be explained if the cation competes with protons for a binding site that has an apparent pK(a) of about 7.0. 6. The results, nevertheless, are not inconsistent with the possibility that both the uncharged form and the intracellular charged form of 4-AP are active in blocking the 4-AP-sensitive potassium channel. This can only be so, however, if the uncharged form is about 150 times more potent than the charged form on a molar basis. In this case, the charged form, although less potent, is so much more abundant at physiological pH that its proportionate contribution to block would be about the same as that of the uncharged form.