COMPARISON OF 3 NEW NONCULTURE TESTS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA GENITAL INFECTIONS

被引:6
|
作者
SCHUBINER, HH
LEBAR, W
JEMAL, C
HERSHMAN, B
机构
[1] WAYNE STATE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,DETROIT,MI 48201
[2] PROVIDENCE HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,SOUTHFIELD,MI 48037
[3] PROVIDENCE HOSP,DEPT MICROBIOL,SOUTHFIELD,MI 48037
关键词
Chlamydia trachomatis Diagnosis Direct fluorescent antibody Isotopic DNA probe Enzyme immunoassay;
D O I
10.1016/0197-0070(90)90111-E
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study compares three new rapid nonculture tests to cell culture with passage for the diagnosis of Chlamydia genital infections in sexually active adolescent and young adult females. Two hundred consecutive patients having a pelvic examination had cervical samples taken for the following: Papanicolaou smear, gonorrhea culture, Chlamydia cell culture, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA; Difco), isotopic DNA probe (Gen-Probe), and enzyme immunoassay (EIA; IDEIA III, Novo BioLabs). After resolution of discrepant results, 25 of the specimens were judged to be positive. The DFA identified 17 of the 25, with 3 false-positive results; the DNA probe identified 20 of the 25, with no false positive results; and the EIA identified 22 of the 25, with one false-positive result. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were DFA, 68%, 98.2%, 85%, 95.5%; DNA probe, 80%, 100%, 100%, 97.2%; and EIA, 88%, 99.4%, 95.6%, 98.3%. These new rapid nonculture tests are comparable and relatively reliable, with trends favoring the EIA and the DNA probe. Further studies with larger samples are needed to determine their clinical utility. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 509
页数:5
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据