RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY

被引：4

作者：

Friedman, Marilyn k ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Vanderbilt Univ, W Alton Jones Chair Philosophy, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA

来源：

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LAW JOURNAL | 2013年 / 63卷 / 02期

关键词：

autonomy; individualism; rights; independence; feminism; constitutive relations; liberalism;

D O I：

10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812RA

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This review explores some of the important issues raised in Jennifer Nedelsky's book, Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. First, it introduces Nedelsky's relational approach and her rejection of liberal individualism. Second, it delves more deeply into Nedelsky's relational account of autonomy. Then, it details Nedelsky's relational approach to rights and law and argues, among other things, that Nedelsky's approach has a consequentialist cast to it. Finally, it provides a critical assessment of Nedelsky's rejection of independence and individualism.

引用

页码：327 / 341

页数：15

共 18 条

[1]

Anderson J.M., 1996, THESIS

[2] Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves [J].

Christman, J .

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2004, 117 (1-2) :143-164

[3]

Christman J, 1989, INNER CITADEL ESSAYS

[4]

Christman J., 2009, POLITICS PERSONS IND, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511635571, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511635571]

[5]

Dworkin R., 1984, THEORIES RIGHTS, V1st, P153

[6]

DWORKIN R, 1977, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOU, pR11

[7]

Friedman Marilyn, 2003, AUTONOMY GENDER POLI, P14

[8]

Lorde A., 1983, THIS BRIDGE CALLED M, P94

[9]

Mackenzie C, 2000, RELATIONAL AUTONOMY

[10]

Mill John Stuart, 1901, UTILITARIANISM

← 1 2 →