'KRIPKENSTEIN' & ABORIGINES: THE TRUE ORDER OF LANGUAGE AND RULE-FOLLOWING PARADOX

被引:0
|
作者
Nekhaev, A., V [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Omsk State Tech Univ, Philosophy, Omsk, Russia
[2] Omsk State Tech Univ, Dept Philosophy & Social Commun, Omsk, Russia
来源
VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE | 2013年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
rule-following; Kripkenstein's paradox; skepticism; true order; replication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article is devoted to thirtieth anniversary of the first publication in 1982 Saul Kripke's book "Wittgenstein on rules and private language". Radical skeptical interpretation of the work 'late' Ludwig Wittgenstein proposed by Saul Kripke in this book is considered one of the most famous "puzzle" of modern philosophy of language, which has become a source of much debate and discussion on the nature of the linguistic sign and its meaning. This article examines some of the consequences of a radical version of skeptical 'rule-following' paradox by Saul Kripke, which remain in force and effect for finite functions and limited linguistic registers 'Ad finitum'. Thereby questioned the widely held view among analytic philosophers that the skeptical core for Saul Kripke's 'rule-following' paradox is argument 'Ad infinitum' (an inherent source of skepticism for our intention to follow the rule is concluded in itself situation of mastering for us endless function on the limited set of examples), and thus any direct or even moderate solutions of this paradox would be focused to its elimination. Thus proved that including for the field of finite functions and languages described theirs the skeptical force of 'rule-following' paradox itself completely saves. Moreover, undertaken in this article analysis detects a very quaint phenomenon to the field of language registers 'Ad finitum' - the effect of 'replication' (in the using of a linguistic phrase is always a n-th set of empirically equivalent but logically incompatible and even non-identical languages which it belongs). Study of the phenomenon of replication leads to a number of important remarks on many critics of Saul Kripke's skeptical paradox, in particular the famous Oxford philosopher Gordon Baker and Peter Hacker. Thus the concept of 'community speakers' has been called by Saul Kripke for skeptical solution to paradox of him own cannot be eliminated by the concept of 'share' and 'shareable' languages proposed for this aim by Gordon Baker and Peter Hacker. Despite the criticism the skeptical paradox 'rule-following' by Saul Kripke is still the center of attention and remains influential in modern philosophy of language and the theory of value.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The metaphysics of rule-following
    Schlosser, Markus E.
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2011, 155 (03) : 345 - 369
  • [2] The metaphysics of rule-following
    Markus E. Schlosser
    Philosophical Studies, 2011, 155 : 345 - 369
  • [3] IMAGINATION AND RULE-FOLLOWING
    Brozek, Bartosz
    MATERIALI PER UNA STORIA DELLA CULTURA GIURIDICA, 2019, 49 (01) : 69 - 88
  • [4] EVIDENCE, THINKING, RULE-FOLLOWING
    Antukh, G. G.
    VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 49 : 5 - 16
  • [5] Broome on reasoning and rule-following
    Philip Pettit
    Philosophical Studies, 2016, 173 : 3373 - 3384
  • [6] RULE-FOLLOWING AND SOCIAL THEORY
    Surovtsev, Valeriy A.
    EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI, 2020, 57 (03): : 50 - 55
  • [7] Intrinsic Responsibility for Rule-Following
    Hlobil, Ulf
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2024,
  • [8] Broome on reasoning and rule-following
    Pettit, Philip
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2016, 173 (12) : 3373 - 3384
  • [9] The Evolution of Simple Rule-Following
    Barrett J.A.
    Biological Theory, 2013, 8 (2) : 142 - 150
  • [10] Why Lewis' appeal to natural properties fails to Kripke's rule-following paradox
    Merino-Rajme, Carla
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2015, 172 (01) : 163 - 175