Diagnostic Accuracy of F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

被引:8
|
作者
Riaz, Saima [1 ]
Nawaz, Muhammad Khalid [1 ]
Faruqui, Zia S. [2 ]
Kazmi, Syed Ather Saeed [3 ]
Loya, Asif [4 ]
Bashir, Humayun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaukat Khanum Mem Canc Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Shaukat Khanum Mem Canc Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Shaukat Khanum Mem Canc Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Shaukat Khanum Mem Canc Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Pathol, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Carcinoma of unknown primary; F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose; positron emission tomography; conventional imaging;
D O I
10.4274/mirt.05706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Detection of primary tumor site in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome has always been a diagnostic dilemma, necessitating extensive workup. Early detection of primary tumor site coupled with specific therapy improves prognosis. The low detection rate of the primary tumor site can be attributed to the biological behavior or the small size of the primary tumor to be detected by conventional imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in detecting CUP. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 100 PET-CT scans of patients with CUP syndrome between November 2009 and December 2013 was performed. Eighteen patients whose final histopathology results could not be obtained for correlation were excluded from analysis. The hypermetabolic sites were assessed in correlation with histopathology. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were assessed for PET-CT. Results: Out of the 82 patients, primary tumor was correctly identified in 57.3% patients by F-18-FDG PET-CT (true positive). The PET-CT scan results were negative for primary site localization in 15% of patients (false negative). While 21% had true negative results, 7.3% displayed false positive results. PET-CT scan upstaged the disease in 27% cases. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy was found to be 78%, sensitivity 80%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 88.7% and negative predictive value 59%. Conclusion: Our data supports the utility of F-18-FDG PET-CT scan in the localization and staging of CUP syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advantages and disadvantages of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in carcinoma of unknown primary
    Yu, Xiaozhou
    Li, Xiaofeng
    Song, Xiuyu
    Dai, Dong
    Zhu, Lei
    Zhu, Yanjia
    Wang, Jian
    Zhao, Huiqin
    Xu, Wengui
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (05) : 3785 - 3792
  • [2] Utility of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed in carcinoma of unknown primary
    Elboga, Umut
    Kervancioglu, Selim
    Sahin, Ertan
    Basibuyuk, Mustafa
    Celen, Y. Zeki
    Aktolun, Cumali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (12): : 8941 - 8946
  • [3] Clinical applications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in carcinoma of unknown primary
    Hu Man
    Zhao Wei
    Zhang Pin-liang
    Ju Gui-fang
    Fu Zheng
    Zhang Guo-li
    Kong Li
    Yang Yan-qin
    Ma Yi-dong
    Yu Jin-ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (07) : 1010 - 1014
  • [4] Simultaneous whole body F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of pediatric cancer: Preliminary experience and comparison with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography
    Pugmire, Brian S.
    Guimaraes, Alexander R.
    Lim, Ruth
    Friedmann, Alison M.
    Huang, Mary
    Ebb, David
    Weinstein, Howard
    Catalano, Onofrio A.
    Mahmood, Umar
    Catana, Ciprian
    Gee, Michael S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 8 (03): : 322 - 330
  • [5] Usefulness of F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Management of Cervical Dystonia
    Lee, Han Byul
    An, Young-Sil
    Lee, Hyun Young
    Hwang, Jee Hyun
    Lee, Hyun Jung
    Jeong, Kil Yong
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Yim, Shin-Young
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2012, 36 (06): : 745 - 755
  • [6] 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as an Effective Diagnostic Workup in Cervical Metastasis of Carcinoma from an Unknown Primary Tumor
    Zhao, Kui
    Luo, Xing-Mei
    Zhou, Shui-Hong
    Liu, Jian-Hua
    Yan, Sen-Xiang
    Lu, Zhong-Jie
    Yang, Shu-Ye
    Lin, Li-Li
    Dong, Meng-Jie
    CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2012, 27 (10) : 685 - 693
  • [7] Clinical value of whole-body F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary
    Wang, Guohui
    Wu, Yaopan
    Zhang, Weidong
    Li, Jiayao
    Wu, Peihong
    Xie, Chuanmiao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 57 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [8] Accuracy of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Patients with Rising Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels
    Yu, W. L.
    Wong, S. M.
    Wang, K.
    Ahuja, A. T.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 17 (01): : 9 - 15
  • [9] 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography to diagnose recurrent cancer
    J J You
    K J Cline
    C-S Gu
    K I Pritchard
    I S Dayes
    K Y Gulenchyn
    R I Inculet
    S K Dhesy-Thind
    M A Freeman
    A M Chan
    J A Julian
    M N Levine
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 1737 - 1743
  • [10] 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography to diagnose recurrent cancer
    You, J. J.
    Cline, K. J.
    Gu, C-S
    Pritchard, K. I.
    Dayes, I. S.
    Gulenchyn, K. Y.
    Inculet, R. I.
    Dhesy-Thind, S. K.
    Freeman, M. A.
    Chan, A. M.
    Julian, J. A.
    Levine, M. N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (11) : 1737 - 1743