Teresina's planning and municipal budget for economic growth and environment during 2014 to 2016

被引:0
作者
dos Milagres Garcia do Nascimento, Sanny Maria [1 ]
Alcobaca Gomes, Jaira Maria [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Piaui UFPI, Programa Posgrad Desenvolvimento & Meio Ambiente, Teresina, PI, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Piaui UFPI, Dept Econ, Programa Posgrad Desenvolvimento & Meio Ambiente, Teresina, PI, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Piaui UFPI, Dept Econ, Programa Posgrad Polit Publ, Teresina, PI, Brazil
来源
URBE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO URBANA | 2018年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
Urban planning tools; Sustainable cities; Economic growth; Environment;
D O I
10.1590/2175-3369.010.003.AO15
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The construction of sustainable cities starts from the perspective of compatibility between economic growth and ecological caution. In this context, the present study analyzed the incorporation of this paradigm to the Teresina's urban planning instruments. In order to do so, we selected the guidelines of the city master plan that act directly on economic growth and the environment, and examined the provision and budget execution for these standards in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The results revealed a municipality that promoted productive activities with steps that diminish the stress on the environment, by providing a master plan with criteria for solid waste management, environmental zoning, green areas, urban drainage, clean rivers and sanitary sewage. We noticed the alignment between the instruments investigated also identified the provision of resources for environmental management, basic sanitation, urban public cleaning and waste collection services, as well as for the promotion of productive sectors. But in examining the financial execution, we verified that less than 50% of the budget foreseen for these areas was executed, with the municipality concentrating budget execution in areas such as social security, special expenses and health. We concluded that Teresina incorporated the principles of sustainable city in the urban planning instruments analyzed, but in the years 2014 to 2016 did not prioritize these areas with financial resources.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 707
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Andrade D. C., 2008, LEITURAS EC POLITICA, V14, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CENS DEM
[3]  
Braga R, 2011, PERSPECTIVAS GESTAO, P111
[4]  
Brasil. Ministerio do Planejamento Orcamento e Gestao, 2015, MAN TECN ORC MTO
[5]  
Cavalcanti Clóvis, 2010, Estud. av., V24, P53, DOI 10.1590/S0103-40142010000100007
[6]  
Comissao Mundial Sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (CMMAD), 1991, NOSS FUT COM
[7]  
Fundacao Prefeito Faria Lima-CEPAM, 2005, PLAN DIR PASS PASS
[8]  
Gadotti M, 2002, DIALOGOS ENTRE ESFER, P49
[9]  
IBGE, 2016, PROD INT BRUT MUN
[10]  
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE), 2015, PROD INT BRUT MUN 20