The arthroscopic bone needle. A new, safe and cost-effective technique for rotator cuff repair

被引:0
作者
Frick, H. [1 ]
Haag, M. [1 ]
Volz, M. [1 ]
Stehle, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sportklin Ravensburg, Bachstr 57, D-88214 Ravensburg, Germany
关键词
Rotator cuff; Arthroscopic bone needle; Achorless reconstruction; Reruptur rate; Cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1007/s00142-011-0664-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Reconstruction of a rotator cuff tendon tear using transosseous sutures was the gold standard when surgery was still done open or mini-open and has the advantage of no implants and cost-effectiveness. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is less invasive but suture anchors are expensive. This abstract will introduce a novel technique for treatment of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combining the advantages of an arthroscopic procedure and transosseous sutures. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical results, patient satisfaction, short-term rerupture rates with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and hardware costs of this procedure. Material and Methods. From August 2008 to November 2009 a total of 66 patients with a tear of the supraspinatus tendon were treated using an arthroscopic bone needle. Patients were evaluated with the constant score (CS), patient satisfaction and complications. The hardware costs of a supraspinatus reconstruction using the arthroscopic bone needle were documented and compared in each case to the hardware costs using the estimated number of suture anchors that would have been necessary. A separate study was performed to evaluate the rerupture rate after supraspinatus reconstruction whereby 20 consecutive patientstreated from July 2010 to January 2011 had an MRI 3 months postoperatively and were evaluated by independent radiologists using the criteria of Sugaya. The arthroscopic bone needle technique is based on the Giant Needle (R) method but changes in the design, material and in the surgical technique were made to allow multiple usage of the needle and (in contrast to the Giant Needle (R) method) the sutures were first made in the bone and not in the tendon, which allows the surgeon to decide how and where the sutures penetrate the tendon and what configuration of sutures and knots should be made. Results. The 60 patients (including 25 women, mean age 61 years) were examined approximately 1 year postoperatively at follow-up and 6 patients had an additional infraspinatus rupture and 16 a subscapularis rupture. The acromioclavicular (AC) joint was resected in 41 and the long head of the biceps was treated in 45 patients. The average CS was 73 (SD 12) which equals a CS normalized for age and gender of 92% (SD 15) and 56 patients (93%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. No axillary nerve injuries or fractures of the greater tuberosity occurred. The hardware costs of a supraspinatus reconstruction were reduced by 80% using the arthroscopic bone needle technique compared to suture anchors (121 EUR versus 600 EUR) and 2 patients (10%) suffered a rerupture of the reconstructed tendon in the MRI. Conclusion. The arthroscopic bone needle technique proved to be a new, safe and cost-effective method with good clinical results and low rerupture rate for the repair of rotator cuff ruptures.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The new Subclavian portal and modified Neviaser portal for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Nord, KD
    Mauck, BM
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (09) : 1030 - 1034
  • [22] Efficacy of bone marrow-stimulating technique in rotator cuff repair
    Bilsel, Kerem
    Yildiz, Fatih
    Kapicioglu, Mehmet
    Uzer, Gokcer
    Elmadag, Mehmet
    Pulatkan, Anil
    Esrefoglu, Mukaddes
    Bozdag, Ergun
    Milano, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (08) : 1360 - 1366
  • [23] Comparison of implant cost and surgical time in arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair
    Black, Eric M.
    Austin, Luke S.
    Narzikul, Alexa
    Seidl, Adam J.
    Martens, Kelly
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (09) : 1449 - 1456
  • [24] Advantages of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Transosseous Suture Technique: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Randelli, Pietro
    Stoppani, Carlo Alberto
    Zaolino, Carlo
    Menon, Alessandra
    Randelli, Filippo
    Cabitza, Paolo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (09) : 2000 - 2009
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair
    Akcal, Mehmet Akif
    Ozturk, Nazife
    Isikcelik, Ferda
    Agirbas, Ismail
    MARMARA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 34 (01): : 66 - 71
  • [26] Bone Marrow Stimulation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Danilkowicz, Richard M.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Mirzayan, Raffy
    Dickens, Jonathan F.
    Anakwenze, Oke
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (12) : 3167 - 3172
  • [27] Reversibility of Supraspinatus Muscle Atrophy in Tendon-Bone Healing After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Park, Yong Bok
    Ryu, Ho Young
    Hong, Jin Ho
    Ko, Young Hoo
    Yoo, Jae Chul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (04) : 981 - 988
  • [28] Arthroscopic repair of retracted adhesed rotator cuff tears and subscapularis tears: The effective use of interval slide releases
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHOULDER SURGERY, 2007, 1 (01): : 39 - 44
  • [29] The investigation of acute effects of fascial release technique in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomized controlled trial
    Coban, Tugce
    Demirdel, Ertugrul
    Yildirim, Necmiye Un
    Deveci, Alper
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 48
  • [30] Double arthroscopic transtendon repair of partial-thickness articular surface tears of the rotator cuff: a surgical technique
    Fukuta, Shoji
    Amari, Rui
    Tsutsui, Takahiko
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2015, 23 (03) : 395 - 397