LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES AS LOYALTY-GENERATING INSTITUTIONS

被引:30
作者
COKER, DC
CRAIN, WM
机构
[1] Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, VA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01053230
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The current debate over models of self-selection in Congress - whether Congressmen by-and-large find themselves on committees which most closely correspond to their constituents' interests - has implications for theories of Congressional organization. Building on recent findings which question a categorical self-selection process, in this paper we present a theory of committee function based on loyalty to party leaders. As a rationale for leadership privilege, and to provide context for our argument, we first present a theoretical framework based on a modified model of cooperation. We then focus on certain specifics of our leadership theory; that rank-and-file members vote leadership interests in exchange for leader support in gaining choice committee assignments and aid in passing legislation. This leads to predictions about voting patterns across committees. Static tests of these relations are performed, as well as those incorporating changes in voting patterns with seniority.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 221
页数:27
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
AKERLOF GA, 1983, AM ECON REV, V73, P54
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PARTIES LEADERS POST
[3]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[4]  
CRAIIN WM, 1990, PREDICTING POLITICS
[5]  
CRAIN WM, 1986, AM EC REV SEP, P833
[6]  
Fiorina MP., 1977, C KEYSTONE WASHINGTO
[7]  
GART JJ, 1967, BIOMETRIKA, V54, P181, DOI 10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.181
[8]   ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATIVE COMMITTEES BY A RATIONAL LEGISLATURE [J].
GILLIGAN, TW ;
KREHBIEL, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1990, 34 (02) :531-564
[9]   INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE IN THE UNITED-STATES-HOUSE-OF-REPRESENTATIVES [J].
HAEBERLE, SH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1978, 40 (04) :1054-1065
[10]   THE COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT PROCESS AND THE CONDITIONAL NATURE OF COMMITTEE BIAS [J].
HALL, RL ;
GROFMAN, B .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (04) :1149-1166