GLYPHOSATE REMOVAL FROM DRINKING-WATER

被引:37
作者
SPETH, TF
机构
[1] Drinking Water Res. Div., Risk Reduction Engrg. Lab., Cincinnati, OH
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 1993年 / 119卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1993)119:6(1139)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Activated-carbon, oxidation, conventional-treatment, filtration, and membrane studies are conducted to determine which process is best suited to remove the herbicide glyphosate from potable water. Both bench-scale and pilot-scale studies are completed. Computer models are used to evaluate the results. The activated-carbon results show that glyphosate adsorbs very strongly in distilled water, but has a much lower capacity in Ohio River water. The jar-test studies with an alum coagulant show that as turbidity is removed, so is glyphosate. The majority of the glyphosate removal occurs as turbidity is reduced below 2 nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs). Powdered-activated-carbon treatment is ineffective. Ultrafiltration membranes and 0.45 mum filters do not remove glyphosate in Ohio River water even though the effluent turbidity is reduced below 0.2 NTU. The oxidation results indicate that glyphosate is easily destroyed by chlorine and ozone. Chlorine dioxide, permanganate, and hydrogen peroxide are less successful. These conventional-treatment and adsorption results are confirmed by pilot-scale studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1157
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   TREATMENT, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND COST FOR REMOVAL OF RADIOACTIVITY FROM DRINKING-WATER [J].
REID, GW ;
LASSOVSZKY, P ;
HATHAWAY, S .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1985, 48 (05) :671-694
[32]   EVALUATION OF CARTRIDGE FILTERS FOR REMOVAL OF SMALL FIBERS FROM DRINKING-WATER [J].
COOK, PM ;
GLASS, GE ;
MARKLUND, DR ;
TUCKER, JH .
JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1978, 70 (08) :459-464
[33]   INDIGESTION FROM DRINKING-WATER [J].
不详 .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 1 (5803) :799-&
[34]   DRINKING-WATER FROM SEWAGE [J].
PARKINSON, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1983, 90 (07) :30-+
[35]   Ultrafiltration for removal of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in drinking water [J].
Cabral Coelho, Edumar Ramos ;
Reis, Dariene Patricia .
ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2021, 26 (05) :837-843
[36]   The effect of ozonation on particle removal in drinking-water treatment [J].
Bourgine, FP ;
Chapman, JI ;
Bastiment, RJ ;
Gennery, MG ;
Green, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 12 (03) :170-174
[37]   DRINKING-WATER CONTAMINANTS - SOURCES, HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS, AND REMOVAL [J].
WATTS, TE ;
SINGER, RD .
MINNESOTA MEDICINE, 1990, 73 (02) :33-36
[38]   VIRUS REMOVAL AND RECOVERY IN THE DRINKING-WATER TREATMENT TRAIN [J].
STETLER, RE ;
WALTRIP, SC ;
HURST, CJ .
WATER RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (06) :727-731
[39]   USE OF FLUORESCENCE IN MONITORING REMOVAL OF ORGANICS IN DRINKING-WATER [J].
SYLVIA, AE ;
DONLAN, RJ .
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 176 (SEP) :220-220
[40]   DRINKING-WATER [J].
GERBAL, R .
GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1988, 95 (28) :7-7