Public Good as Public Interest? The Principle of Tangibility in Eminent Domain Legislation

被引：7

作者：

Olejarski, Amanda M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Shippensburg Univ, Publ Adm, Shippensburg, PA 17257 USA

来源：

PUBLIC INTEGRITY | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期

关键词：

eminent domain; ethics; public good; public interest;

D O I：

10.2753/PIN1099-9922130403

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

In its landmark 2005 Kelo v. New London decision, the Supreme Court invited state legislatures to enact stricter eminent domain legislation. This study invites readers to consider the terms "public good" and "public interest" in the context of such legislation. The distinctions between the two terms are important because of the deference shown to administrators in interpreting and implementing post-Kelo law. The proposed principle of tangibility facilitates the simultaneous protection of individual private property rights and states' rights to advance the public good.

引用

页码：333 / 351

页数：19

共 46 条

[1] Benson BL, 2008, INDEP REV, V12, P423
[2] Berliner D, 2003, PUBLIC POWER PRIVATE
[3] Berliner Dana, 2002, GOVT THEFT TOP 10 AB
[4] BERLINER DANA, 2006, OPENING FLOODGATES E, P1
[5] BIXBY MB, 1987, AM BUS LAW J, V24, P621
[6] Boudreaux P, 2005, DENVER U LAW REV, V83, P1
[7] THE ADMINISTRATOR AS TRUSTEE OF THE PUBLIC-INTEREST - NORMATIVE IDEALS AND DAILY PRACTICE
BOX, RC
[J]. ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1992, 24 (03) : 323 - 345
[8] Calfee C, 2006, ECOL LAW QUART, V33, P545
[9] Castle Coalition, 2009, EN LEG KEL
[10] Cohen CE, 2006, HARVARD J LAW PUBL P, V29, P491

← 1 2 3 4 5 →