THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF HUMAN DIGNITY IN GERMANY AND ISRAEL

被引:8
作者
Bendor, Ariel L. [1 ]
Sachs, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Fac Law, Legal Res, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Law, Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0021223700000959
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article applies comparative law tools to portray eight significant aspects of the constitutional right to human dignity in Germany and Israel. The elements considered are: the constitutional status of human dignity; the nature of the right; its effect on other constitutional rights; its scope and definition; waiver of human dignity; human dignity after death; negative and positive aspects of the right; and the right to asylum. The textual foundations of the respective constitutional guarantees are as different as human dignity's core meaning. In Germany, such guarantees are held to be absolute, immune to restriction, and therefore quite narrow in scope. In Israel, the scope of the right is much broader, but it is subject to limitations when placed against the public interest. Still, based on the findings of our comprehensive comparison, similar dynamics can be identified in Germany and Israel. The constitutional coverage of both absolute and relative principles is broad, as are the constitutional lacunas, which are those dimensions of constitutional law neglected by the written constitution.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 61
页数:37
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1849, REICHSGESETZBLATT RG, P101
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1948, PARLEMENTARISCHE RAT
[3]  
ANSCHUTZ GERHARD, 1933, VERFASSUNG DTSCH REI, P151
[4]  
BARAK AHARON, 1994, INTERPRETATION LAW C
[5]  
Barak Aharon, 1993, LAW GOVT
[6]  
Barak Aharon, 2005, ZAMIR BOOK LAW GOVT, P227
[7]  
Barak Aharon, 2006, JUDGE DEMOCRACY, P85
[8]  
Barak Aharon, 1992, MISHPAT UMIMSHAL, V1, P9
[9]  
BARAK AHARON, 2003, PURPOSIVE INTERPRETA, P449
[10]  
Brugger W., 1996, STAAT, V35, P67