SOME WORRIES FOR WOULD-BE WAMMERS

被引:0
作者
Leite, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
DeRose appeals to ordinary English usage to support his contextualist semantics for "know"-attributions. A common objection holds that though the relevant assertions are both appropriate and seemingly true, their seeming truth arises merely from their appropriateness. This Warranted Assertability Maneuver (WAM) aims to provide a stand-alone objection by providing a reason not to take the ordinary language data at face-value. However, there is no plausible model or mechanism for the pragmatic phenomena WAMmers must postulate. Given what the WAM requires, it is doubtful it could work out in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 125
页数:25
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bach K., CONTEXTUALI IN PRESS
[2]  
Bach Kent, 1994, MIND LANGUAGE, V9, P124, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
[3]  
Cohen S., 1999, PHILOS PERSPECT, V13, P58
[4]   CONTEXTUALISM AND KNOWLEDGE ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
DEROSE, K .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (04) :913-929
[5]  
DeRose K, 2003, PHILOS REV, V111, P167
[6]  
DeRose K., PHILOS Q IN PRESS
[7]  
DeRose K., 1999, BLACKWELL GUIDE EPIS, P185
[8]  
Grice H. Paul, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P183
[9]  
Grice P, 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS
[10]  
Hawthorne J., 2004, KNOWLEDGE LOTTERIES