THE ARGUMENTATIVE NATURE OF HOLDING STRONG VIEWS - A CASE-STUDY

[1] Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON

[2] ATKINSON JM, 1979, ORDER COURT

[3] PREJUDICE, CATEGORIZATION AND PARTICULARIZATION - FROM A PERCEPTUAL TO A RHETORICAL APPROACH [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 15 (01) : 79 - 103

[4] Billig M., 1988, INTERDISCIPLINARY J, V8, P91, DOI [10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.91, DOI 10.1515/TEXT.1.1988.8.1-2.91]

[5] BILLIG M, 1988, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1080/09515088808572927

[6] Billig M., 1987, ARGUING THINKING RHE

[7] BILLIG M, 1986, GETTING LIFE

[8] Billig M., 1988, IDEOLOGICAL DILEMMAS

[9] BILMES J, 1987, LANG SOC, V17, P161

[10] Brook L., 1987, BRIT SOCIAL ATTITUDE

[1] Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON

[2] ATKINSON JM, 1979, ORDER COURT

[3] PREJUDICE, CATEGORIZATION AND PARTICULARIZATION - FROM A PERCEPTUAL TO A RHETORICAL APPROACH [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 15 (01) : 79 - 103

[4] Billig M., 1988, INTERDISCIPLINARY J, V8, P91, DOI [10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.91, DOI 10.1515/TEXT.1.1988.8.1-2.91]

[5] BILLIG M, 1988, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1080/09515088808572927

[6] Billig M., 1987, ARGUING THINKING RHE

[7] BILLIG M, 1986, GETTING LIFE

[8] Billig M., 1988, IDEOLOGICAL DILEMMAS

[9] BILMES J, 1987, LANG SOC, V17, P161

[10] Brook L., 1987, BRIT SOCIAL ATTITUDE