A strain gauge analysis comparing 4-unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant-borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non-engaging abutments before and after torque application

被引:14
作者
Epprecht, Alyssa [1 ]
Zeltner, Marco [1 ]
Benic, Goran [1 ]
Ozcan, Mutlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
engaging and non-engaging abutments; FDP; oral implants; strain gauge; zirconia;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.97
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study quantified the strain development after inserting implant-borne fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to various implant-abutment joints. Two bone-level implants (empty set = 4.1 mm, RC, SLA 10 mm, Ti, Straumann) were inserted in polyurethane models (N = 3) in the area of tooth nos 44 and 47. Four-unit veneered zirconium dioxide FDPs (n = 2) were fabricated, one of which was fixed on engaging (E; RC Variobase, empty set = 4.5 mm, H = 3.5 mm) and the other on non-engaging (NE) abutments (RC Variobase, empty set = 4.5 mm, H = 5.5 mm). One strain gauge was bonded to the occlusal surface of pontic no. 46 on the FDP and the other two on the polyurethane model. Before (baseline) and after torque (35 Ncm), strain values were recorded three times. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (alpha = 0.05). Mean strain values presented significant increase after torque for both E and NE implant-abutment connection type (baseline: E = 4.33 +/- 4.38; NE = 4.85 +/- 4.85; torque: E = 196.56 +/- 188.02; NE = 275.63 +/- 407.7; p<.05). Mean strain values based on implant level presented significant increase after torque for both E and NE implant-abutment connection (baseline: E = 4.94 +/- 5.29; NE = 5.78 +/- 5.69; torque: E = 253.78 +/- 178.14; NE = 347.72 +/- 493.06; p < .05). The position of the strain gauge on implants (p = .895), FDP (p = .275), and abutment connection type (p = .873) did not significantly affect the strain values. Strain levels for zirconium dioxide implant-borne FDPs were not affected by the implant-abutment connection type.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks [J].
Abduo, Jaafar ;
Bennani, Vincent ;
Lyons, Karl ;
Waddell, Neil ;
Swain, Michael .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (06) :658-663
[2]   Straight and Offset Implant Placement under Axial and Nonaxial Loads in Implant-Supported Prostheses: Strain Gauge Analysis [J].
Abreu, Celina Wanderley ;
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu ;
Balducci, Ivan ;
Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (07) :535-539
[3]   A Strain Gauge Analysis Comparing External and Internal Implant-Abutment Connections [J].
Asvanund, Pattapon .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (02) :206-211
[4]   Strain analysis of different diameter Morse taper implants under overloading compressive conditions [J].
Castro, Carolina Guimaraes ;
Zancope, Karla ;
Verissimo, Crisnicaw ;
Soares, Carlos Jose ;
das Neves, Flavio Domingues .
BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (01) :1-6
[5]  
Cehreli Murat C, 2002, Implant Dent, V11, P286
[6]   Strain Gauge Analysis of Occlusal Forces on Implant Prostheses at Various Occlusal Heights [J].
Cho, Young-Eun ;
Park, Eun-Jin ;
Koak, Jai-Young ;
Kim, Seong-Kyun ;
Heo, Seong-Joo ;
Park, Ji-Man .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (05) :1034-1041
[7]   Strain Gauge Analysis of the Effect of Porcelain Firing Simulation on the Prosthetic Misfit of Implant-Supported Frameworks [J].
De Vasconcellos, Diego Klee ;
Oezcan, Mutlu ;
Maziero Volpato, Claudia Angela ;
Bottino, Marco Antonio ;
Yener, Esra Salihoglu .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (03) :225-229
[8]  
Heckmann S. M., 2014, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V15, P466
[9]   Validation of Strain Gauges as a Method of Measuring Precision of Fit of Implant Bars [J].
Hegde, Rashmi ;
Lemons, Jack E. ;
Broome, James C. ;
McCracken, Michael S. .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (02) :151-161
[10]   Influence of forces on peri-implant bone [J].
Isidor, Flemming .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 :8-18