Prospective Analysis of Life-Cycle Indicators through Endogenous Integration into a National Power Generation Model

被引:35
作者
Garcia-Gusano, Diego [1 ]
Martin-Gamboa, Mario [1 ]
Iribarren, Diego [1 ]
Dufour, Javier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst IMDEA Energia, Syst Anal Unit, Av Ramon de la Sagra 3, E-28935 Mostoles, Spain
[2] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem & Energy Technol, C Tulipan S-N, E-28933 Mostoles, Spain
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2016年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
electricity; energy planning; energy system model; life cycle assessment; life-cycle indicator; scenario analysis; sustainability;
D O I
10.3390/resources5040039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Given the increasing importance of sustainability aspects in national energy plans, this article deals with the prospective analysis of life-cycle indicators of the power generation sector through the case study of Spain. A technology-rich, optimisation-based model for power generation in Spain is developed and provided with endogenous life-cycle indicators (climate change, resources, and human health) to assess their evolution to 2050. Prospective performance indicators are analysed under two energy scenarios: a business-as-usual one, and an alternative scenario favouring the role of carbon dioxide capture in the electricity production mix by 2050. Life-cycle impacts are found to decrease substantially when existing fossil technologies disappear in the mix (especially coal thermal power plants). In the long term, the relatively high presence of natural gas arises as the main source of impact. When the installation of new fossil options without CO2 capture is forbidden by 2030, both renewable technologies and-to a lesser extent-fossil technologies with CO2 capture are found to increase their contribution to electricity production. The endogenous integration of life-cycle indicators into energy models proves to boost the usefulness of both life cycle assessment and energy systems modelling in order to support decision-and policy-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hybrid solar power system versus photovoltaic plant: A comparative analysis through a life cycle approach
    Magrassi, Fabio
    Rocco, Elena
    Barberis, Stefano
    Gallo, Michela
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 130 : 290 - 304
  • [42] Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint
    Gao, Chengkang
    Zhu, Sulong
    An, Nan
    Na, Hongming
    You, Huan
    Gao, Chengbo
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 147
  • [43] Study on a new reed-coal coupled power generation system in Wuliangsuhai Lake wetland -Life cycle assessment and economic and technical analysis
    Zhan, Lulu
    Zhang, Xi
    Hanjin, Lan
    Li, Rui
    Wu, Yulong
    FUEL, 2023, 353
  • [44] Environmental impact assessment of VOC emissions from biomass gasification power generation system based on life cycle analysis
    Sun, Yunqi
    Wang, Shuo
    Yang, Qing
    Li, Jianlan
    Wang, Liang
    Zhang, Shihong
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    FUEL, 2023, 335
  • [45] Prospective study of lignin-based and recycled carbon fibers in composites through meta-analysis of life cycle assessments
    Hermansson, Frida
    Janssen, Matty
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 223 : 946 - 956
  • [46] Comparative life-cycle assessment of maize cobs, maize stover and wheat stalks for the production of electricity through gasification vs traditional coal power electricity in South Africa
    Mdhluli, Faith Tokologo
    Harding, Kevin G.
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 3
  • [47] Life cycle assessment and exergoeconomic analysis of the multi-generation system based on fuel cell for methanol, power, and heat production
    Mehrpooya, Mehdi
    Ansarinasab, Hojat
    Mousavi, Seyed Ali
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 172 : 1314 - 1332
  • [48] Water use of a biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China: A combination of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis
    Zhu, Yuli
    Liang, Ji
    Yang, Qing
    Zhou, Hewen
    Peng, Kun
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 115
  • [49] Assessing life cycle water use and pollution of coal-fired power generation in China using input-output analysis
    Chai, Li
    Liao, Xiawei
    Yang, Liu
    Yan, Xianglin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 231 : 951 - 958
  • [50] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of coal-to-aromatics process with integration of renewable energy-based hydrogen generation technology
    Zhang, Junqiang
    Liu, Ruonan
    Zhang, Guizhu
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Junwen
    Wang, Fuchen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434