Prospective Analysis of Life-Cycle Indicators through Endogenous Integration into a National Power Generation Model

被引:35
作者
Garcia-Gusano, Diego [1 ]
Martin-Gamboa, Mario [1 ]
Iribarren, Diego [1 ]
Dufour, Javier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst IMDEA Energia, Syst Anal Unit, Av Ramon de la Sagra 3, E-28935 Mostoles, Spain
[2] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem & Energy Technol, C Tulipan S-N, E-28933 Mostoles, Spain
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2016年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
electricity; energy planning; energy system model; life cycle assessment; life-cycle indicator; scenario analysis; sustainability;
D O I
10.3390/resources5040039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Given the increasing importance of sustainability aspects in national energy plans, this article deals with the prospective analysis of life-cycle indicators of the power generation sector through the case study of Spain. A technology-rich, optimisation-based model for power generation in Spain is developed and provided with endogenous life-cycle indicators (climate change, resources, and human health) to assess their evolution to 2050. Prospective performance indicators are analysed under two energy scenarios: a business-as-usual one, and an alternative scenario favouring the role of carbon dioxide capture in the electricity production mix by 2050. Life-cycle impacts are found to decrease substantially when existing fossil technologies disappear in the mix (especially coal thermal power plants). In the long term, the relatively high presence of natural gas arises as the main source of impact. When the installation of new fossil options without CO2 capture is forbidden by 2030, both renewable technologies and-to a lesser extent-fossil technologies with CO2 capture are found to increase their contribution to electricity production. The endogenous integration of life-cycle indicators into energy models proves to boost the usefulness of both life cycle assessment and energy systems modelling in order to support decision-and policy-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comprehensive Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Polygeneration Systems Based on Plasma Gasification and Combined Cycle Power Generation
    Xu, Wenwu
    Yang, Lili
    Fan, Xiaorui
    Cui, Peizhe
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Zhang, Hongru
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (01): : 669 - 680
  • [32] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FIRST-AND SECOND-GENERATION BIOFUELS BASED ON AN ECONOMIC VALUATION OF LIFE-CYCLE IMPACTS
    Gabrielle, Benoit
    Zhu, Yuanzao
    Marette, Stephan
    Martinet, Vincent
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1338 - 1344
  • [33] Life cycle co2 emission analysis of hydrogen storage and battery for wind power generation
    Usui T.
    Hondo H.
    Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 2010, 89 (06): : 551 - 561
  • [34] Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation
    Kabir, Md Ruhul
    Rooke, Braden
    Dassanayake, G. D. Malinga
    Fleck, Brian A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 133 - 141
  • [35] A life cycle framework for comparative analysis of power generation technologies based on prioritized sustainable development goals
    Tourinho, Tiago C. O.
    Serra, Eduardo G.
    Araujo, Ofelia Q. F.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 326
  • [36] Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of China's power generation on spatial and temporal scale
    Zhu, Xiaonan
    Wang, Shurong
    Wang, Lei
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (04) : 1083 - 1095
  • [37] Methodological approach towards sustainability by integration of environmental impact in production system models through life cycle analysis: Application to the Rioja wine sector
    Jimenez, Emilio
    Martinez, Eduardo
    Blanco, Julio
    Perez, Mercedes
    Graciano, Charmery
    SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 90 (02): : 143 - 161
  • [38] Key performance indicators for biogas production-methodological insights on the life-cycle analysis of biogas production from source-separated food waste
    Feiz, Roozbeh
    Johansson, Maria
    Lindkvist, Emma
    Moestedt, Jan
    Paledal, Soren Nilsson
    Svensson, Niclas
    ENERGY, 2020, 200 (200)
  • [39] Telemedicine for sustainable postoperative follow-up: a prospective pilot study evaluating the hybrid life-cycle assessment approach to carbon footprint analysis
    Lathan, Ross
    Hitchman, Louise
    Walshaw, Josephine
    Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj
    Carradice, Daniel
    Smith, George
    Chetter, Ian
    Yiasemidou, Marina
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [40] Multicriteria Environmental and Economic Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Power Plant with Carbon Capture and Separation from the Life-Cycle Perspective
    Tang, Yuting
    You, Fengqi
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (01): : 937 - 956