Systemwide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children's Hospital

被引:33
|
作者
Gerhardt, Wendy E. [1 ]
Mara, Constance A. [2 ,3 ]
Kudel, Ian [2 ,4 ]
Morgan, Esi M. [5 ]
Schoettker, Pamela J. [2 ]
Napora, Jason [6 ]
Britto, Maria T. [7 ]
Alessandrini, Evaline A. [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, James M Anderson Ctr Hlth Syst Excellence, Qual Outcomes & Evidence, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] James M Anderson Ctr Hlth Syst Excellence, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Pediat, CCHMC, Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[4] Qual Metr Inc Optum, Lincoln, NE USA
[5] James M Anderson Ctr Hlth Syst Excellence, Rheumatol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] CCHMC, Informat Serv, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] James M Anderson Ctr Hlth Syst Excellence, Div Adolescent & Transit Med, Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[8] Univ Cincinnati Hlth Syst, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.01.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite a growing literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), little has been written to guide development of a standardized, systemwide PRO program across multiple clinics and conditions. A PRO implementation program, which was created at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, a large children's hospital, can serve as a standardized approach for the use of PROs in a clinical setting. Methods: Recommended standardized PRO implementation components include identification of a committed clinical leader and team, selection of an instrument that addresses the identified outcome of interest, specifying threshold scores that indicate when an intervention is needed, identification of clinical interventions to be triggered by threshold scores, provision of training for providers and staff involved in the PRO implementation process, and the measurement and monitoring of PRO use. Results: For each instrument, the completion goal is 80%, defined as the number of PRO measures that were actually completed divided by the number that should have been completed. The overall combined completion rate is 75% for the 68 unique instruments currently in use. Case studies of specific clinical team experiences demonstrate the value of using PROs and the implementation components and shows how PROs are used to promote patient-centered care. Conclusion: Data on PRO implementation are collected on an ongoing basis to confirm the value of the program, define ongoing improvement, and fuel collaborative research to further refine essential implementation components and successful spread. Next steps include measuring the influence of PRO use on coproduction of patient-centered clinical care and the impact PRO measurement has on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 453
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Patient Knows Best: Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Routine Clinical Care
    Nipp, Ryan
    Temel, Jennifer
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2017, 109 (09):
  • [2] Implementation of thyroid-related patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice
    Cramon, Per Karkov
    Bjorner, Jakob Bue
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Boesen, Victor Brun
    Bonnema, Steen Joop
    Hegedus, Laszlo
    Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
    Rasmussen, Ase Krogh
    Watt, Torquil
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes in routine care: impact for TwiCs
    Vickers, Andrew
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [4] Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes: Rationale and Clinical Implementation
    Woody, Jennifer
    Tennant, Joshua
    JNP- THE JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 18 (04): : 377 - 382
  • [5] Routine Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment Into Thoracic Surgery Practice
    Khullar, Onkar, V
    Perez, Aubriana
    Dixon, Meredith
    Binongo, Jose N.
    Sancheti, Manu S.
    Pickens, Allan
    Gillespie, Theresa
    Force, Seth D.
    Fernandez, Felix G.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (02): : 526 - 532
  • [6] USE OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROs) and Its Implementation in Clinical Care in India: A Clinician's Perspective
    Lal, P.
    Patel, D.
    Khambholja, K.
    Marulkar, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S51 - S51
  • [7] Implementation of Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care
    Girgis, A.
    Bamgboje-Ayodele, A.
    Rincones, O.
    Vinod, S.
    Avery, S.
    Descallar, J.
    Arnold, B.
    Arnold, A.
    Bray, V.
    Durcinoska, I.
    Rankin, N.
    Delaney, G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (09) : S257 - S258
  • [8] Listen to the patient: integrating patient-reported outcomes into clinical care
    Boulanger, Mary C.
    Petrillo, Laura A.
    Temel, Jennifer S.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (12): : 1451 - 1453
  • [9] Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study
    Mazariego, C.
    Jefford, M.
    Chan, R. J.
    Roberts, N.
    Millar, L.
    Anazodo, A.
    Hayes, S.
    Brown, B.
    Saunders, C.
    Webber, K.
    Vardy, J.
    Girgis, A.
    Koczwara, B.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2022, 16 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [10] Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study
    C. Mazariego
    M. Jefford
    R. J. Chan
    N. Roberts
    L. Millar
    A. Anazodo
    S. Hayes
    B. Brown
    C. Saunders
    K. Webber
    J. Vardy
    A. Girgis
    B. Koczwara
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2022, 16 : 33 - 43