A framework for prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in R&D

被引:64
作者
Kim, Dong-Young [1 ]
Kumar, Vinod [1 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Sprott Sch Business, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Intellectual capital; Research and development; Analytic hierarchy process; Delphi method; Human capital;
D O I
10.1108/14691930910952669
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for prioritizing intellectual capital (IC) indicators, as well as suggesting key improvement areas by using the Delphi approach and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The effectiveness of the framework is demonstrated through the case study of a public sector research and development organization. Findings - This paper identifies three major characteristics of the framework: weighing indicators that should be based on an organization's strategies and contexts; employing multiple processes (Delphi and AHP approaches) which can overcome the limitation of a single methodology; and providing a visual map that can help management identify which indicators and related activities need attention and should be improved. Originality/value - This research contributes to the literature and practices in several ways. First, this paper provides a practical and operational guideline on how to engage in IC management efficiently. Second, the authors try to integrate IC management into traditional management tools (e.g. quality management) by employing the concept of an operational feedback process and three screening processes. Third, this paper tests the possibility of using a Delphi approach in prioritizing IC indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / +
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A framework of intangible valuation areas and antecedents [J].
Andreou, Andreas N. ;
Green, Annie ;
Stankosky, Michael .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2007, 8 (01) :52-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MER GUID MAN REP INT
[3]  
Austrian Research Centers (ARC), 2005, INT CAP REP
[4]   Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field [J].
Bontis, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (5-8) :433-462
[5]   Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital [J].
Bontis, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 3 (01) :41-60
[6]  
Bontis N., 2002, J INTELLECT CAP, V3, P223, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930210435589
[7]   TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT USING A DELPHI APPROACH - A JAPANESE-GERMAN COOPERATION [J].
BREINER, S ;
CUHLS, K ;
GRUPP, H .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1994, 24 (02) :141-153
[8]   Construction of key model for knowledge management system using AHP-QFD for semiconductor industry in Taiwan [J].
Chen, S. C. ;
Yang, C. C. ;
Lin, W. T. ;
Yeh, T. M. ;
Lin, Y. S. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 18 (05) :576-598
[9]  
CHONG CW, 2000, J INTELLECTUAL CAPIT, V1, P366, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930010359261
[10]  
Clinton B. D., 2002, MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTIN, V3, P1