Performance measurement systems in the Finnish public sector

被引:52
作者
Rantanen, Hannu [1 ]
Kulmala, Harri I. [2 ]
Lonnqvist, Antti [3 ]
Kujansivu, Paula [4 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Lahti, Finland
[2] VVT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Tampere, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Technol, Inst Business Informat Management, Tampere, Finland
[4] Tampere Univ Technol, Inst Ind Management, Tampere, Finland
关键词
Public sector organizations; Performance measures; Performance management systems; Finland;
D O I
10.1108/09513550710772521
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to identify the specific problems faced by the Finnish public sector organizations in designing and implementing performance measurement systems (PMS). Design/methodology/approach - An understanding of the problems is obtained by examining three case organizations in practice. In order to support the analysis of the empirical findings, a review of prior literature on the private and public sector PMSs is carried out. Findings - The design and implementation processes in the Finnish public sector organizations differ significantly from the way they are realized in industrial private sector companies. The four underlying reasons for problems in public sector organizations are the following: there are many stakeholders with conflicting needs; the end products and goals are undefined; there is a lack of property ownership and lacking management skills. Practical implications - By utilizing the results of the study, PMS design and implementation in the public sector can be carried out by taking into account and avoiding the evident pitfalls introduced in the study. Originality/value - A large portion of the prior research on public sector PMSs consists of surveys and conceptual studies. This paper describes three case studies and reveals new insights into the specific challenges faced by public sector organizations, especially in designing and implementing PMSs.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Argyris C., 1996, ORG LEARNING
  • [2] Bourne M., 2003, International Journal of Business Performance Management, V5, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJBPM.2003.002097
  • [3] Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems
    Bourne, M
    Mills, J
    Wilcox, M
    Neely, A
    Platts, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (07) : 754 - 771
  • [4] The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives - Perceptions of participating managers
    Bourne, M
    Neely, A
    Platts, K
    Mills, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (11) : 1288 - 1310
  • [5] Brignall S., 2000, MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTIN, V11, P281, DOI [DOI 10.1006/MARE.2000.0136, https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136]
  • [6] Chan Y.-C.-L., 2004, INT J PUBLIC SECTOR, V17, P204, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513550410530144, 10.1108/09513550410530144]
  • [7] Collier P.M., 2006, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V17, P57
  • [8] Action research for operations management
    Coughlan, P
    Coghlan, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (02) : 220 - 240
  • [9] Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health
    Curtis, S
    Gesler, W
    Smith, G
    Washburn, S
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 50 (7-8) : 1001 - 1014
  • [10] De Bruijn H, 2002, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V15, P578, DOI 10.1108/09513550210448607