Analysis of criteria for referral of type 2 diabetes patients from primary care to specialized care in spain. A Pathways Study

被引:3
作者
Javier Escalada, Francisco [1 ]
Ezkurra, Patxi [2 ]
Ferrer, Juan Carlos [3 ]
Ortega, Carlos [4 ]
Roldan, Cecilia [5 ]
Font, Beatriu [5 ]
机构
[1] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Endocrinol & Nut, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Centro Salud Zumaia, Serv Med Familiar & Comun, Zumaia, Guipuzkoa, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Consorcio Hosp Gen, Unidad Diabet & Endocrinol, Valencia, Spain
[4] Ctr Salud Pozoblanco, Unidad Gestion Clin Pozoblanco, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Dept Hlth Outcomes, Barcelona, Spain
来源
AVANCES EN DIABETOLOGIA | 2013年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Referrals; Primary care; Endocrinology;
D O I
10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.03.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the reasons for referral of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients from primary care ( PC) to specialized care (SC) in Spain. To assess the level of compliance with referral criteria established in national recommendations. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, multi-centre national study, in PC and SC. Each physician provided, using a structured case report form, data on usual practice for T2DM patient referral and data about referral of 6 patients. Recommendations of the Spanish Society for Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the National Health System (NHS) were used as reference documents to assess compliance. Data from clinical practice of 143 professionals of SC/641 general practitioners (GPs) and from referrals of 805 patients to PC/3,624 to SC are presented. Results: Almost one-third (31.8%) of GPs and 46.2% of SC professionals reported the existence of a coordination protocol with the other healthcare level. The most frequent communication tool for referrals to SC was a Consultation Report (89.2%), and the Medical History for referrals to PC. The referral criterion to SC most frequently declared was Metabolic Instability (80.5%) and to PC was Goal Achievement (96.5%). The most frequent cause for referral to SC among the patients studied was Reassessment (48.4%) and to PC Goal Achievement (91.6%). Almost half (46.8%) of GPs applied all NHS criteria in usual practice, and 3.9% all SEEN referral criteria. Conclusions: The number of reported coordination protocols is low, and the compliance with national guidelines is poor. (C) 2012 Sociedad Espanola de Diabetes. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, GUIA PRACT CLIN DIA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, PLAN INT DIAB MELL C
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, INF AN SIST NAC SAL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, GUIES PRACT CLIN AB
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, PLAN INT AT DIAB 200
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, ESTR DIAB SIST NAC S
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, PLAN DIAB COM VAL 20
  • [8] COORDINATED PRIMARY AND SPECIALTY CARE FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS, GUIDELINES, AND SYSTEMS: AN EDUCATIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT
    Beaser, Richard S.
    Okeke, Eyiuche
    Neighbours, James
    Brown, Julie
    Ronk, Katie
    Wolyniec, Walter W.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (06) : 880 - 890
  • [9] Consejeria de Salud, 2002, DIAB MELL TIP 2 PROC
  • [10] Forga L, 2005, ENDOCRINOL NUTR, V52, P30