CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MYELOGRAPHY IN 6 HORSES WITH CERVICAL STENOTIC MYELOPATHY

被引:58
|
作者
MOORE, BR [1 ]
HOLBROOK, TC [1 ]
STEFANACCI, JD [1 ]
REED, SM [1 ]
TATE, LP [1 ]
MENARD, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT VET CLIN SCI, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02814.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The cervical spines of 6 horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy (CSM) were examined using myelography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Histopathology of the spinal cord of these horses identified 10 neurologically significant compressive lesions. Myelography and CECT were both able to demonstrate all 10 spinal cord compressive lesions, but myelography falsely identified 2 sites and CECT falsely identified 1 site as compressive lesions of the spinal cord which were not supported by histopathology. Additional qualitative information was obtained by CECT regarding the source, severity and location of spinal cord compression. Computed tomography identified stenosis of the vertebral canal with circumferential loss of contrast agent and documented lateral compressive lesions of the spinal cord due to malformed articular facets. Compression of the peripheral nerve roots by malformed articular facets encroaching on the intervertebral foramen was easily identified by CECT in the axial plane. No compressive lesions were identified in 3 unaffected horses by either method. Minimum sagittal diameter (MSD) values obtained from CECT images were strongly correlated with necropsy measurements, validating CECT as an accurate method of obtaining MSD values. The MSD values in the CSM-affected horses were significantly narrowed (P < 0.05) from C3C6 regardless of the site of spinal cord compression, when compared with the unaffected controls. This finding supports previous reports suggesting that generalised stenosis of the vertebral canal is an important feature in the pathogenesis of cervical stenotic myelopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE PANCREAS
    NUUTINEN, P
    KIVISAARI, L
    LEHTOLA, A
    TALJA, M
    STANDERTSKJOLDNORDENSTAM, CG
    LEMPINEN, M
    SCHRODER, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 21 (04) : 483 - 486
  • [2] EXCLUSION OF MONOAMNIOTIC TWINNING BY CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    PERKINS, RP
    TERRY, JD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 79 (05): : 876 - 878
  • [3] CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING OF THE POSTOPERATIVE SPINE
    BROWN, BM
    BEDELL, JE
    FRANK, E
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1986, 25 (04): : 351 - 356
  • [4] RENAL PERFUSION QUANTIFIED WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    BLOMLEY, MJK
    KORMANO, M
    COULDEN, R
    STARK, V
    BUFKIN, C
    LIPTON, MJ
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 : S232 - S233
  • [5] CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE NORMAL AND ABNORMAL GALLBLADDER
    WHITEHOUSE, RW
    MARTIN, DF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1986, 59 (707): : 1083 - 1085
  • [6] CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MYELOGRAPHY COMPARED
    DANIELS, DL
    GROGAN, JP
    JOHANSEN, JG
    MEYER, GA
    WILLIAMS, AL
    HAUGHTON, VM
    RADIOLOGY, 1984, 151 (01) : 109 - 113
  • [7] CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE GALLBLADDER IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS
    SOMER, K
    KIVISAARI, L
    STANDERTSKJOLDNORDENSTAM, CG
    KALIMA, TV
    GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1984, 9 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [8] DISSECTION OF THE THORACIC AORTA DETERMINED BY CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    KANIC, V
    KOLENC, M
    ZDRAVSTVENI VESTNIK, 1987, 56 (7-8): : 277 - 278
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF IOPROMIDE WITH IOPAMIDOL AND IOHEXOL FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    GOLDBERG, SN
    ABRAHAMS, J
    DRAYER, BP
    GOLDING, S
    BERNARDINO, M
    BRUNETTI, J
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 : S76 - S83
  • [10] SPINAL-CORD EXPANSION AFTER DECOMPRESSION IN CERVICAL MYELOPATHY - INVESTIGATION BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY MYELOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    MATSUYAMA, Y
    KAWAKAMI, N
    MIMATSU, K
    SPINE, 1995, 20 (15) : 1657 - 1663