ON THE NATURE OF AUDITORY NEGLECT - A REPLY TO HUGDAHL AND WESTER

被引：11

作者：

BEATON, A ^{[1
]}

MCCARTHY, M ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ROYAL HOSP & HOME,LONDON,ENGLAND

来源：

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE | 1995年 / 48卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1006/brln.1995.1017

中图分类号：

R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];

学科分类号：

100104 ; 100213 ;

摘要：

We respond to the points raised by Hugdahl and Wester (1994) and argue that a definition of auditory neglect must be based not on consideration of lesion location and extension but on a theoretical understanding of the mechanisms held to underlie neglect in the auditory modality. A first requirement is to describe the phenomenon that has to be explained. An ear extinction effect in dichotic listening, even considered along with the site of brain damage, does not provide sufficient justification for the effect to be attributed to ''neglect.''

引用

页码：351 / 358

页数：8

共 16 条

[1] AUDITORY NEGLECT AFTER RIGHT FRONTAL-LOBE AND RIGHT PULVINAR THALAMIC LESIONS - COMMENT [J].