EUTHANASIA, DYING WELL AND THE SLIPPERY SLOPE

被引:5
作者
ALLMARK, P [1 ]
机构
[1] N TRENT COLL NURSING & MIDWIFERY,SHEFFIELD,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18081178.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Arguments in favour of voluntary euthanasia tend to be put in utilitarian terms. This paper suggests an alternative, neo-Aristotelian argument justifying certain individual acts of both suicide and voluntary euthanasia. It goes on to examine the slippery slope arguments against legalizing euthanasia. It is suggested that such arguments cut both ways. However, the suggestion that we ought therefore to permit a social experiment in voluntary euthanasia is set alongside the Dutch experience. The latter seems to imply that if such experiments are to take place then great caution needs to be applied.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1182
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
CAMPBELL R., 1988, ENDING LIVES
[2]  
Foot P, 1978, VIRTUES VICES
[3]  
GLOVER J, 1979, CAUSING DEATH SAVING
[4]  
Harris J, 1985, VALUE LIFE
[5]  
KESEY K, 1973, ONE FLEW OVER CUCKOO
[6]  
MacIntyre A., 1985, AFTER VIRTUE
[7]  
Mason J.K., 1987, LAW MED ETHICS, V2nd
[8]  
NOWACK R, 1992, NEW SCI 0620, P28
[9]  
SINGER P, 1989, PRACTICAL ETHICS
[10]   THE SLIPPERY SLOPE ARGUMENT [J].
VANDERBURG, W .
ETHICS, 1991, 102 (01) :42-65