A COMPARISON OF NONTHREADED, ENHANCED THREADED, AND ELLIS FIXATION PINS USED IN TYPE-I EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATORS IN DOGS

被引:48
作者
ANDERSON, MA
MANN, FA
WAGNERMANN, C
HAHN, AW
JIANG, BL
TOMLINSON, JL
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI,COLL VET MED,DEPT VET MED & SURG,COLUMBIA,MO 65201
[2] UNIV MISSOURI,MED CTR,SCH MED,DIV CARDIOTHORAC SURG,COLUMBIA,MO 65201
[3] UNIV MISSOURI,DALTON RES CTR,COLUMBIA,MO 65201
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-950X.1993.tb00425.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Three different pin types (Ellis, enhanced threaded, and nonthreaded) were used in type 1 external skeletal fixation after transverse osteotomy of the radius and ulna in 12 skeletally mature dogs. Dogs were placed into three groups of four dogs based on the pin type used. Axial extraction forces were determined for each of the pin types after 8 weeks of weight bearing (chronic study). Nine contralateral radii were used to determine axial extraction forces for nine of each pin type not subjected to weight bearing forces (acute study). The force required for extraction of the enhanced threaded and Ellis pins in the chronic and acute studies was not significantly different. The force required to extract the nonthreaded pins was significantly less than that required for the other two pin types. Ground reaction forces had returned to levels measured before surgery by 2 weeks after surgery in the enhanced threaded and Ellis pin groups, however, dogs in the nonthreaded pin group required 4 weeks until normal ground reaction forces were measured. Radiographic evaluations 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery showed no difference among groups in the number of pin tract radiolucencies, however, the enhanced threaded pins had caused more trans-cortical chip fractures than the other two pin types. None of the pins broke during the eight-week chronic study.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 489
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] ARON DN, 1986, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V22, P659
  • [2] BEHRENS F, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V178, P103
  • [3] BEHRENS F, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V241, P48
  • [4] COMPARISON OF THE STRENGTH AND HOLDING POWER OF 4 PIN DESIGNS FOR USE WITH HALF PIN (TYPE-1) EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION
    BENNETT, RA
    EGGER, EL
    HISTAND, M
    ELLIS, AB
    [J]. VETERINARY SURGERY, 1987, 16 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [5] THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STANDARD HOFFMANN-VIDAL EXTERNAL FIXATION APPARATUS
    BRIGGS, BT
    CHAO, EYS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (04) : 566 - 573
  • [6] Brinker W O, 1975, Vet Clin North Am, V5, P197
  • [7] BRINKER WO, 1985, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V21, P801
  • [8] BUDSBERG SC, 1987, AM J VET RES, V48, P915
  • [9] CHAO EYS, 1982, CONCEPTS EXTERNAL FI, V12, P13
  • [10] EFFECT OF FIXATION PIN INSERTION ON THE BONE-PIN INTERFACE
    EGGER, EL
    HISTAND, MB
    BLASS, CE
    POWERS, BE
    [J]. VETERINARY SURGERY, 1986, 15 (03) : 246 - 252